Ah, I think I found what you are referring to, that's KARAF-3601. Martin is using features-add-to-repository, but not to build a custom distribution directly. I'll undelete it ;-)
2015-04-17 9:30 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>: > Ah, good point, I missed that. > I don't think it was on dev, I'll try to find the email. > > > 2015-04-17 8:58 GMT+02:00 Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]>: > >> Hi >> >> I can't remember if it's been on the mailinglist or in the issue, but a >> user of our maven plugin just mentioned >> he uses one of the to-be-deleted goals for documentation purposes. >> Just as a little reminder, don't know if you had it on your screen, that >> we >> should consider those use-cases maybe usefull :-) >> >> regards, Achim >> >> >> 2015-04-17 5:30 GMT+02:00 Freeman Fang <[email protected]>: >> >> > +1 for first set of names. >> > >> > Thanks >> > －－－－－－－－－－－－－ >> > Freeman(Yue) Fang >> > >> > Red Hat, Inc. >> > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >> > >> > >> > >> > On 2015-4-16, at 下午10:49, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> > >> > > I created KARAF-3671 for this discussion. >> > > >> > > I'm proposing the following: >> > > * remove features-add-to-repository goal >> > > * remove the features-validate-descriptor >> > > * rename install-kars goal to *assembly* >> > > * rename instance-create-archive to *archive* >> > > * rename verify-features to *verify* >> > > * rename features-create-kar to *kar* >> > > >> > > The other goals are: >> > > * features-export-meta-data >> > > * features-generate-descriptor >> > > * commands-generate-help >> > > and we'd have to find names more >> > > >> > > I'm not really sure the features-generate-descriptor is widely used. >> Is >> > it >> > > ? >> > > >> > > For the naming, another option is to keep the [resource]-[action] >> idiom: >> > > * assembly-create >> > > * assembly-archive >> > > * kar-create >> > > * commands-generate-help >> > > * features-verify >> > > * features-generate-descriptor >> > > * features-export-meta-data >> > > >> > > The first option seems more inline with usual maven plugins, and they >> > look >> > > nicer to me, but I don't really mind. >> > > Thoughts ? >> > > >> > > >> > > 2015-04-08 12:44 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>: >> > > >> > >> In master, the karat-maven-plugin contains the following goals: >> > >> * features-add-to-repository >> > >> * features-create-kar >> > >> * features-export-meta-data >> > >> * features-generate-descriptor >> > >> * install-kars >> > >> * features-validate-descriptor >> > >> * verify-features >> > >> >> > >> The features-add-to-repository mojo seems somewhat redundant with the >> > >> install-kars mojo which is used to build our own distribution. The >> > >> features-export-meta-data seems redundant with the >> > >> features-generate-descriptor, and the features-validate-descriptor >> seems >> > >> redundant with the verify-features goal. >> > >> >> > >> Am I missing something, or should we get rid of the >> > >> features-add-to-repository, features-export-meta-data and >> > >> features-generate-descriptor goals for 4.0 ? >> > >> >> > >> Cheers, >> > >> Guillaume >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> >> Apache Member >> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & >> Project Lead >> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >> >> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >> > >
