Hi,

+1 (non-binding)

Tested on Camel CDI 2.17.3 example (uses AMQ).

Thanks!

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Svetoslav Neykov <
svetoslav.ney...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the context Markus. With that in mind it makes sense to release
> 4.0.7 as is so I am changing my vote to +1 (non binding).
> I'll try to upgrade to 4.0.5 and wait for the next release.
>
> Svet.
>
>
> > On 20.09.2016 –≥., at 12:24, Markus Rathgeb <maggu2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Svetoslav,
> >
> > I assume the same as JB already stated to me
> > "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d19fda54132fbe9f16ee1caf621122
> c8e3a8feea1d2bc501d725a9ff@%3Cdev.karaf.apache.org%3E"
> > fits here.
> > "As said during 4.0.6 vote, 4.0.7 is first to upgrade Pax Web and fix
> > the  service enforcement and include some other bug fixes."
> >
> > I am fine to stay on 4.0.5 and wait for 4.0.8 that hopefully contains
> > that fixes.
> > But if 4.0.7 targets to fix only specific 4.0.6 bugs (+upgrades) I
> > don't think the release should be cancelled.
>
>

Reply via email to