Hi, +1 (non-binding)
Tested on Camel CDI 2.17.3 example (uses AMQ). Thanks! On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Svetoslav Neykov < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the context Markus. With that in mind it makes sense to release > 4.0.7 as is so I am changing my vote to +1 (non binding). > I'll try to upgrade to 4.0.5 and wait for the next release. > > Svet. > > > > On 20.09.2016 г., at 12:24, Markus Rathgeb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Svetoslav, > > > > I assume the same as JB already stated to me > > "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d19fda54132fbe9f16ee1caf621122 > c8e3a8feea1d2bc501d725a9ff@%3Cdev.karaf.apache.org%3E" > > fits here. > > "As said during 4.0.6 vote, 4.0.7 is first to upgrade Pax Web and fix > > the service enforcement and include some other bug fixes." > > > > I am fine to stay on 4.0.5 and wait for 4.0.8 that hopefully contains > > that fixes. > > But if 4.0.7 targets to fix only specific 4.0.6 bugs (+upgrades) I > > don't think the release should be cancelled. > >
