+1 for the removal of the jpa feature in karaf. I also agree that feature names are not unique enough. Probably we need repo id or url + feature name.
Christian 2017-06-10 16:22 GMT+02:00 Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>: > Hi, > > just recently I stumbled over a strange effect while building a customized > Karaf with boot features. > In the end it turned out, the reason for that had been two features with > the same name but not the same content. > > Right now we do have a jpa feature in the enterprise repository > (feature.xml) in version 2.6.0 > While the same feature name exists from the aries repository (feature.xml) > also in version 2.6.0 > > I opened an issue for this: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5185 > right now I'm in favor of dumping the jpa feature in the enterprise > repository in favor of the aries jpa feature. If there are no objections > I'd start to remove the enterprise feature. > > In general though we can't really expect to have unique feature names only > by the feature name itself. Maybe it's time to take the repository also > into account as coordinate for feature declarations? > > regards, Achim > > -- > > Apache Member > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master > -- -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de <https://owa.talend.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=3aa4083e0c744ae1ba52bd062c5a7e46&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.liquid-reality.de> Open Source Architect http://www.talend.com <https://owa.talend.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=3aa4083e0c744ae1ba52bd062c5a7e46&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.talend.com>
