+1 Regards JB
On Jun 10, 2017, 16:22, at 16:22, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >just recently I stumbled over a strange effect while building a >customized >Karaf with boot features. >In the end it turned out, the reason for that had been two features >with >the same name but not the same content. > >Right now we do have a jpa feature in the enterprise repository >(feature.xml) in version 2.6.0 >While the same feature name exists from the aries repository >(feature.xml) >also in version 2.6.0 > >I opened an issue for this: >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5185 >right now I'm in favor of dumping the jpa feature in the enterprise >repository in favor of the aries jpa feature. If there are no >objections >I'd start to remove the enterprise feature. > >In general though we can't really expect to have unique feature names >only >by the feature name itself. Maybe it's time to take the repository also >into account as coordinate for feature declarations? > >regards, Achim > >-- > >Apache Member >Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer >& >Project Lead >blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> > >Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
