Hi,

I've gone through kogito-runtimes & kogito-apps and found 11 extensions
missing in the spreadsheet. I already added them at the bottom but there
and tried to set the right new target name. However there are 4 that IDK
where to fit them, so if  anyone could take a look...Those are:

Kogito Add-On Fabric8 Kubernetes Service Catalog
org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-fabric8-kubernetes-service-catalog
Kogito Add-On Knative Serving
org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-knative-serving
Kogito Add-On MicroProfile Config Service Catalog
org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-microprofile-config-service-catalog
Python support for serverless workflow
org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-serverless-workflow-python


Thank you!
Pere

On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 12:58, Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <
ftira...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Ok, thanks for confirming. Now I'm going to start preparing for a new round
> of build failures ;) (like the one for quarkus 3)
> On the other hand, I agree that, if we should change names, better to do
> that before our first release ;)
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:50 PM Alex Porcelli <porce...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Francisco,
> >
> > By Kris email, he stated that this is a blocker for release. But scoped
> to
> > only artifact name changes.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 6:38 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <
> > ftira...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry if this was mentioned previously, are we planning to do the
> > renaming
> > > before the release?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:14 PM Pere Fernandez (apache) <
> > > pefer...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > @Kris I still see some extensions missing in the spreadsheet (a part
> of
> > > the
> > > > ones that Alex mentioned):
> > > >
> > > > Kogito Addons Quarkus Data Index Persistence PostgreSQL:
> > > >
> org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-data-index-persistence-postgresql
> > > > Kogito Addons Quarkus Data Index Persistence Infinispan:
> > > >
> org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-data-index-persistence-infinispan
> > > > Kogito Addons Quarkus Data Index Persistence MongoDB:
> > > > org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-data-index-persistence-mongodb
> > > >
> > > > Job Http Recipient extension: org.kie.kogito:job-http-recipient
> > > > Job Sink Recipient extension: org.kie.kogito:job-sink-recipient
> > > >
> > > > can we add the missing ones in the spreadsheet?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 09:25, Pere Fernandez (apache) <
> > > pefer...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 to that!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 23:40, Alex Porcelli <porce...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1 for the streamlined approach
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 5:33 PM Kris Verlaenen <
> > > > kris.verlae...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > I believe there is sufficient consensus on the approach so we
> are
> > > > >> executing
> > > > >> > on this.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Note that the recommendation is to focus on the module renaming
> > for
> > > > now
> > > > >> > (and whatever would be absolutely necessary to integrate into
> > > quarkus,
> > > > >> e.g.
> > > > >> > metadata updates), as this is considered a blocker for the
> > release.
> > > > >> > While there is more work to be done (renaming other modules,
> > > renaming
> > > > >> > properties, etc.), let's try to prioritize getting the renaming
> > > merged
> > > > >> asap
> > > > >> > and we can follow up with more changes later.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thx,
> > > > >> > Kris
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 4:44 PM Alex Porcelli <a...@porcelli.me>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > The following extensions are missing in the spreadsheet:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > org.kie:kogito-addons-quarkus-jobs
> > > > >> > > org.kie:kogito-addons-data-audit-quarkus
> > > > >> > > org.kie:kogito-addons-data-audit-jpa-quarkus
> > > > >> > > org.kie:kogito-addons-data-audit-springboot
> > > > >> > > org.kie:kogito-addons-data-audit-jpa-springboot
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > The org.kie.kogito:kogito-quarkus I suggest to preserve and
> > rename
> > > > to
> > > > >> > > org.jbpm:jbpm-with-drools - and not remove.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > And, for now I'd prefer to preserve all extensions, so not
> > > removing
> > > > >> > > the following:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > org.kie:kie-addons-quarkus-events-predictions
> > > > >> > > org.kie:kie-addons-quarkus-explainability
> > > > >> > > org.kie:kie-addons-quarkus-tracing-decision
> > > > >> > > org.kie:kie-quarkus-predictions
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 7:31 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
> > > > >> > > <ftira...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > +1
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 1:05 PM Kris Verlaenen <
> > > > >> > kris.verlae...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > It's up to us to define how to use Kogito.  I guess the
> > term I
> > > > >> used
> > > > >> > > > > (supporting service) isn't well-defined and open for
> > > > >> interpretation.
> > > > >> > > If we
> > > > >> > > > > define them more like services that are developed as part
> of
> > > the
> > > > >> KIE
> > > > >> > > > > project and could (potentially) be independent, then job
> > > service
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> > > data
> > > > >> > > > > index would fall under that category, but persistence (for
> > the
> > > > >> > runtime
> > > > >> > > > > engine) would more like eventing and other generic
> services
> > > > under
> > > > >> > kie,
> > > > >> > > > > where it's more connecting to other external services.  I
> > > > updated
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > > > proposal to reflect this.  Wdyt?
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > There were a few missing modules that were added after the
> > > > >> > spreadsheet
> > > > >> > > was
> > > > >> > > > > created, I added them, but they are following the same
> > > > reasoning.
> > > > >> > > > > I also incorporated Pere's suggestion on
> jbpm-quarkus-devui.
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Thx,
> > > > >> > > > > Kris
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 4:30 PM Alex Porcelli <
> > > a...@porcelli.me>
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > I think the spreadsheet shared by Kris is missing quite
> > some
> > > > >> > > information,
> > > > >> > > > > > I’ll double check it and get back to this thread.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > Hopefully with the updates that are missing, we can
> > clarify
> > > > >> > Francisco
> > > > >> > > > > > concerns.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 6:43 AM Francisco Javier Tirado
> > > Sarti <
> > > > >> > > > > > ftira...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > I think that we should set a criteria, I do not mind
> > which
> > > > >> one.
> > > > >> > For
> > > > >> > > > > > > example, if we took the one: "across all engines" vs
> > > > "workflow
> > > > >> > > > > > > (bpmn+sonata, but not drools)", then, at a first look,
> > > > >> > persistence
> > > > >> > > can
> > > > >> > > > > be
> > > > >> > > > > > > considered kie, but job service would be just kogito
> ;).
> > > > @Kris
> > > > >> > > > > Verlaenen
> > > > >> > > > > > > <kverl...@redhat.com> I think we need some more
> > concrete
> > > > >> > > guidelines
> > > > >> > > > > > here.
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:37 PM Enrique Gonzalez
> > Martinez
> > > <
> > > > >> > > > > > > elguard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > El mar, 6 feb 2024 a las 12:01, Francisco Javier
> > Tirado
> > > > >> Sarti
> > > > >> > > > > > > > (<ftira...@redhat.com>) escribió:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > I agree with you. It is crystal clear what is
> bpmn,
> > > what
> > > > >> is
> > > > >> > > rules
> > > > >> > > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > what
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > is serverless workflow. I just wanted to clarify
> > what
> > > is
> > > > >> not
> > > > >> > > clear.
> > > > >> > > > > > And
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > what is not clear, in my opinion, is the meaning
> of
> > > > >> > supporting
> > > > >> > > > > > service.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > And
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think the example I mention still stands.
> > > Persistence
> > > > is
> > > > >> > > > > mentioned
> > > > >> > > > > > as
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > supporting service and messaging is not, why? I
> > hardly
> > > > see
> > > > >> > > > > > persistence
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > being more important than the possibility of
> > starting
> > > a
> > > > >> > process
> > > > >> > > > > > through
> > > > >> > > > > > > > an
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > event (something that cannot be done if the
> > messaging
> > > > >> addon
> > > > >> > is
> > > > >> > > not
> > > > >> > > > > > > there
> > > > >> > > > > > > > as
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > dependency).
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Therefore, as a tentative, I proposed to use the
> > > > >> distinction
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > between microservice (because even if data index
> is
> > > > >> deployed
> > > > >> > > > > > embedded,
> > > > >> > > > > > > it
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > is still conceptually a microservice)  vs
> > > infrastructure
> > > > >> > > service
> > > > >> > > > > as a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > criteria to rename addos as Kie vs Kogito. Or we
> can
> > > > just
> > > > >> > avoid
> > > > >> > > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > distinction at all and just rename as kie all
> addons
> > > > that
> > > > >> are
> > > > >> > > not
> > > > >> > > > > > > > specific
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > to drools, jbpm or sonataflow.
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > As mentioned in my prior message the criteria
> avoided
> > > such
> > > > >> > > > > distinction
> > > > >> > > > > > > >  (yes, it is an arbitrary one) but criterias in the
> > end
> > > > are
> > > > >> > > based on
> > > > >> > > > > > > > some arbitrary decision making.
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > I guess the criteria is not really supporting
> service
> > > but
> > > > >> if we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > consider addons something across all engines (kie)
> or
> > > > >> workflow
> > > > >> > > > > > > > (kogito)
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > The important part from my point of view is to have
> > one
> > > > that
> > > > >> > > makes
> > > > >> > > > > > > > sense and the naming fits the criteria.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Regarding persistence or messaging we might come up
> > with
> > > > >> > > different
> > > > >> > > > > > > > arguments to put them in different categories or we
> > can
> > > > set
> > > > >> a
> > > > >> > > degree
> > > > >> > > > > > > > of "importance" (whatever it means in this context)
> > > > >> depending
> > > > >> > > again
> > > > >> > > > > on
> > > > >> > > > > > > > our views of the topic.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > In my case (I guess) I can compromise what I can
> > > consider
> > > > >> > > something
> > > > >> > > > > > > > that I could come up with different arguments that
> > fall
> > > in
> > > > >> any
> > > > >> > of
> > > > >> > > > > > > > those categories and agree with the current
> situation.
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 9:35 AM Enrique Gonzalez
> > > > Martinez <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > egonza...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Francisco,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > For the sake of moving things forward, probably
> > the
> > > > best
> > > > >> > way
> > > > >> > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > address your disagreement with Kris on this
> would
> > be
> > > > for
> > > > >> > you
> > > > >> > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > provide some feedback regarding his approach
> > (where
> > > > your
> > > > >> > > > > > discrepancy
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > lies)
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > This will lead:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 1. remove the focus of just a few components and
> > > move
> > > > >> again
> > > > >> > > to a
> > > > >> > > > > > more
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > general criteria
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2. A common criteria for the current modules and
> > > > future
> > > > >> > ones.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 3. Discuss things in a more broad scope vs
> discuss
> > > > >> element
> > > > >> > by
> > > > >> > > > > > element
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > that could drag too much the conversation.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 4. With a common criteria we can discuss things
> > > > elements
> > > > >> > > because
> > > > >> > > > > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > have already a judgement of how things should be
> > > > named.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The current criteria proposed by Kris is this
> one:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Drools: for anything related to rules,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > jBPM: for everything related to business
> processes
> > > > >> (BPMN2),
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > SonataFlow: for everything related to Serverless
> > > > >> Workflow,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Kogito: for supporting services like
> persistence,
> > > data
> > > > >> > index
> > > > >> > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > job
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > service, and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Kie: just for anything that does not fit in
> other
> > > > >> > categories.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I would point out few things:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > * This criteria does not take into account how
> > > > elements
> > > > >> are
> > > > >> > > being
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > deployed (collocated or microservice); in fact
> > most
> > > of
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > have a
> > > > >> > > > > > > dual
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > nature like data index, audit, jobs, etc...
> (this
> > is
> > > > >> > > independent
> > > > >> > > > > of
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > what will be our recomendations in prod
> > > environments)
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > * The criteria is not taking into account how
> > > > >> dependencies
> > > > >> > > are
> > > > >> > > > > > > working
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > together. For instance jobs or persistence are
> > > > something
> > > > >> > > that the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > engine requires to work 100 % but we can
> > compromise
> > > > >> that in
> > > > >> > > some
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > scenarios might not be needed; like for instance
> > STP
> > > > or
> > > > >> > > workflows
> > > > >> > > > > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > don't require timers.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > * The criteria takes into account functionality
> > > > offered
> > > > >> as
> > > > >> > a
> > > > >> > > > > > > priority.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > * The criteria is not taking into account the
> > > > dependency
> > > > >> > with
> > > > >> > > > > other
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > tiers (like database, brokers, streams....)
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I would suggest you should take the criteria and
> > try
> > > > to
> > > > >> > > refine it
> > > > >> > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > your best of your abilities so we can see
> exactly
> > > > where
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > disagreement lies and Kris (and other people)
> can
> > > > >> engage in
> > > > >> > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > differences and how to reach a middleground.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > El lun, 5 feb 2024 a las 20:15, Francisco Javier
> > > > Tirado
> > > > >> > Sarti
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > (<ftira...@redhat.com>) escribió:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Enrique,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Iḿ afraid  is not that clear, at least for me.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Which definition of supporting service are we
> > > using
> > > > to
> > > > >> > > consider
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > persistence
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > addons ( a java library essentially)  a
> > supporting
> > > > >> > service
> > > > >> > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > not
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > messaging addons (another java library)?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > In other words, and being redundant just in
> > case,
> > > if
> > > > >> in
> > > > >> > > Kris
> > > > >> > > > > > e-mail
> > > > >> > > > > > > > he
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > had
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > not put persistence together with data index
> and
> > > > >> jobs, I
> > > > >> > > would
> > > > >> > > > > > > agree
> > > > >> > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > criteria is crystal clear, because data index
> > and
> > > > job
> > > > >> > > services
> > > > >> > > > > > (as
> > > > >> > > > > > > > being
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > microservices) belong to a different group
> than
> > > > >> messaging
> > > > >> > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > other
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > addons,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > which are essentially optional java libraries
> > that
> > > > >> can be
> > > > >> > > added
> > > > >> > > > > > as
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > dependencies on the example poms. According to
> > > that
> > > > >> > > rationale,
> > > > >> > > > > it
> > > > >> > > > > > > > can be
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > argued that persistence addons belongs to the
> > > second
> > > > >> > group,
> > > > >> > > > > > unless
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Kris
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > referring to the database server and not the
> > > > >> persistence
> > > > >> > > addon
> > > > >> > > > > > > > (please
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > note
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > the similar relation between persistence
> addons
> > > with
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > db
> > > > >> > > > > > server
> > > > >> > > > > > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > messaging addon with the event broker)
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 7:26 PM Enrique
> Gonzalez
> > > > >> Martinez
> > > > >> > <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > egonza...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > +1 to kris approach
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > The criteria is well defined and make sense.
> > The
> > > > >> only
> > > > >> > > maybe
> > > > >> > > > > > point
> > > > >> > > > > > > > of
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > discussion would be jobs as it needs to be
> > there
> > > > to
> > > > >> get
> > > > >> > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > fully
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > functional workflow engine.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > El lun, 5 feb 2024, 18:11, ricardo zanini
> > > > fernandes
> > > > >> <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ricardozan...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > escribió:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > +1, Javi
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 12:58 PM Francisco
> > > Javier
> > > > >> > Tirado
> > > > >> > > > > > Sarti <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ftira...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think is better to consider messaging,
> > > > >> > persistence,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > marshallers
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > so
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > infrastructure (kogito or kie) and
> > > data-index
> > > > >> and
> > > > >> > > jobs as
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > supporting
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > services ( kogito o kie), if we want to
> do
> > > the
> > > > >> > > > > distinction
> > > > >> > > > > > > into
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > libraries
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that are added to a microservice as
> addon
> > > > >> (infra)
> > > > >> > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > microservices
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are not mandatory but heavily
> recommended
> > to
> > > > >> have
> > > > >> > all
> > > > >> > > > > > > > functionality
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > (job
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > service and data index service)
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:54 PM Francisco
> > > > Javier
> > > > >> > > Tirado
> > > > >> > > > > > Sarti
> > > > >> > > > > > > <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ftira...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Kris, sounds good, but I have a
> > > question
> > > > >> why
> > > > >> > is
> > > > >> > > > > > > > persistence
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > considered
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a supporting service and messaging is
> > > not?.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:44 PM Kris
> > > > Verlaenen
> > > > >> <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > kris.verlae...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> All,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Here's a slightly modified proposal
> to
> > > take
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > > > feedback
> > > > >> > > > > > > so
> > > > >> > > > > > > > far
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > into
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> account: the suggestion is to use
> > Drools
> > > > for
> > > > >> > > anything
> > > > >> > > > > > > > related to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > rules,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> jBPM for everything related to
> business
> > > > >> > processes
> > > > >> > > > > > (BPMN2),
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > SonataFlow
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> everything related to Serverless
> > > Workflow,
> > > > >> > Kogito
> > > > >> > > for
> > > > >> > > > > > > > supporting
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > services
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> like persistence, data index and job
> > > > service,
> > > > >> > and
> > > > >> > > kie
> > > > >> > > > > > just
> > > > >> > > > > > > > for
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > anything
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> that doesn't fit any or does fit all
> of
> > > the
> > > > >> > other
> > > > >> > > > > > > > categories.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I added a counter-proposal to the
> > > document
> > > > >> in a
> > > > >> > > > > column D
> > > > >> > > > > > > in
> > > > >> > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > same
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> spreadsheet:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gsttRcXGtwGQO469EYFDhLxJLEA7Kl3gmioR6XhGhjY/edit#gid=0
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Please let us know what you think.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thx,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Kris
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 6:45 PM Alex
> > > > >> Porcelli <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > a...@porcelli.me
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Ricardo,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > One concern that I have with the
> > > proposed
> > > > >> > > renames is
> > > > >> > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > complete
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > vanish of the Kogito brand.
> Although
> > I
> > > > >> always
> > > > >> > > agreed
> > > > >> > > > > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > > > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > need
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > reposition the brands, I also have
> > > > >> concerns to
> > > > >> > > > > > basically
> > > > >> > > > > > > > make
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > one
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > them - that got some decent public
> > > > >> coverage in
> > > > >> > > > > recent
> > > > >> > > > > > > > years -
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > completely disappear.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > My suggestion is to revisit the
> list
> > > and
> > > > >> get
> > > > >> > > some
> > > > >> > > > > > > > components
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > keep
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > the Kogito brand. My inital
> > suggestion
> > > > are
> > > > >> > > > > > persistence,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > data-index
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > job scheduler components to be kept
> > > under
> > > > >> > > Kogito.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > I also see some components that are
> > > > >> planned to
> > > > >> > > be
> > > > >> > > > > > > removed
> > > > >> > > > > > > > like
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > PMML,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Tracing and Predictions that I
> don't
> > > get
> > > > >> why.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 2:42 PM
> > ricardo
> > > > >> zanini
> > > > >> > > > > > fernandes
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > <ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Alex,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > As discussed here's the
> > spreadsheet:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gsttRcXGtwGQO469EYFDhLxJLEA7Kl3gmioR6XhGhjY/edit#gid=0
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > (anyone can edit)
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > It contains only the Quarkus
> > Add-ons
> > > > for
> > > > >> > now,
> > > > >> > > I'll
> > > > >> > > > > > add
> > > > >> > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > remaining
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > libraries tomorrow if we all
> agree
> > > with
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> > > > > format.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > @Jason, we decided to table this
> > > > >> discussion
> > > > >> > > for
> > > > >> > > > > now.
> > > > >> > > > > > > We
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > need to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > rename
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Kogito SW, and other add-ons to
> > > reflect
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > implementation
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> release. We
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > won't add Apache prefix anywhere
> at
> > > > this
> > > > >> > time.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > Cheers!
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:17 AM
> > > Jason
> > > > >> > Porter
> > > > >> > > <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> lightguar...@apache.org>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > I just checked
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://groovy.apache.org/download.html#distro
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> it
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > does
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > look like Groovy has moved all
> of
> > > > their
> > > > >> > GAV
> > > > >> > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.groovy.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > At
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > some
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > point we'll need to do the same
> > > > thing.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On 2023/10/23 14:01:12 Jason
> > Porter
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I missed some of this
> > discussion
> > > > as I
> > > > >> > was
> > > > >> > > out
> > > > >> > > > > on
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Friday. We
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > should
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > look
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > at what Groovy has done.
> They’re
> > > > >> probably
> > > > >> > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > biggest
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > project
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> is
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > in a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > similar space (Java, Maven,
> > number
> > > of
> > > > >> > > artifacts,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > etc.) to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > us
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > has
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > moved
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > over. I suggest we follow what
> > they
> > > > >> have
> > > > >> > > done.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Jason Porter
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Software Engineer
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > He/Him/His
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > IBM
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > From: ricardo zanini
> fernandes
> > <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > ricardozan...@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Date: Friday, October 20,
> 2023
> > at
> > > > >> 13:53
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > To: dev@kie.apache.org <
> > > > >> > > dev@kie.apache.org>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re:
> > > [PROPOSAL]
> > > > >> > > Renaming
> > > > >> > > > > > Kogito
> > > > >> > > > > > > > SW
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > artifacts
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > KIE/SonataFlow
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > As discussed offline, I'm
> gonna
> > > > >> create a
> > > > >> > > > > > > spreadsheet
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > renaming
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > proposition and share it in
> > this
> > > > >> thread.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > We table the discussion about
> > > > >> `apache`
> > > > >> > > > > prefixing
> > > > >> > > > > > > in
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > GAV/namespaces
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > for
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > now.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at
> 2:20 PM
> > > > Alex
> > > > >> > > Porcelli
> > > > >> > > > > <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> porce...@apache.org>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > You have a point in
> regarding
> > > the
> > > > >> > > change of
> > > > >> > > > > > all
> > > > >> > > > > > > > GAVs.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > My suggestion is to table
> > that
> > > > >> > > discussion
> > > > >> > > > > for
> > > > >> > > > > > > now,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > work on
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > inventory
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > and proposed changes. Once
> we
> > > > have
> > > > >> it
> > > > >> > > done,
> > > > >> > > > > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > may
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > start a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > new
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > thread
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > about
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > GAVs.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Wdyt?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at
> 1:07
> > PM
> > > > >> > ricardo
> > > > >> > > > > zanini
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > fernandes <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > ricardozan...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Alex, I can create and
> > share
> > > > this
> > > > >> > > > > > spreadsheet,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > so
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > we can
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > start
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > working on
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > it.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > IMHO, we shouldn't start
> > > adding
> > > > >> > apache
> > > > >> > > > > > > prefixes
> > > > >> > > > > > > > in
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > some
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > components
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > not
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > in others.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > If we ought to add it,
> I'd
> > > > rather
> > > > >> > add
> > > > >> > > > > > > > everything at
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > once.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at
> > > 1:58 PM
> > > > >> Alex
> > > > >> > > > > > Porcelli
> > > > >> > > > > > > <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> a...@porcelli.me>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Ricardo,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Besides the SonataFlow
> > > > proposed
> > > > >> > > changes,
> > > > >> > > > > > > Mario
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > already
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > mentioned a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > similar
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > change in Drools, and
> > we'll
> > > > >> need
> > > > >> > > similar
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > adjustments
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> jBPM.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > We
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > should
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > collectively create a
> > > > >> spreadsheet
> > > > >> > > to be
> > > > >> > > > > > > > shared in
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> thread
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > with
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > an
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > inventory of the
> > extensions
> > > > we
> > > > >> > have
> > > > >> > > with
> > > > >> > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > suggested
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> change;
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > look
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > this in a more
> > > comprehensive
> > > > >> > > approach
> > > > >> > > > > > other
> > > > >> > > > > > > > than
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > local
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > SonataFlow.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Regarding the use of
> the
> > > > Apache
> > > > >> > > prefix,
> > > > >> > > > > > even
> > > > >> > > > > > > > if
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > we are
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > not
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > necessarily
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > required to adopt it
> > right
> > > > >> away,
> > > > >> > > it's
> > > > >> > > > > > > > inevitable
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > we'll
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > have to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > start
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > using it at some point.
> > > Given
> > > > >> that
> > > > >> > > we're
> > > > >> > > > > > > > already
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > discussing
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> a
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > reset
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > with
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 10.x, it would help to
> > make
> > > > the
> > > > >> > > message
> > > > >> > > > > > even
> > > > >> > > > > > > > more
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > apparent
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > sharper
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > incorporate the Apache
> > > prefix
> > > > >> in
> > > > >> > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > proposed
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > changes
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > we'll
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > have
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > in
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the spreadsheet.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > To be more clear and
> > > precise,
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > Apache
> > > > >> > > > > > > > prefix is
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > expected
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > be
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > incorporated only into
> > the
> > > > >> > > components in
> > > > >> > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > spreadsheet
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > AND
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > nothing
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > else,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > so no complete change
> of
> > > GAVs
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> > > > > > namespaces.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at
> > > > 8:51 AM
> > > > >> > > ricardo
> > > > >> > > > > > > zanini
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > fernandes <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> ricardozan...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Jason! Are we
> > required
> > > > to
> > > > >> > > change
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > namespaces/GAV
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> include
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > `apache`?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I'd
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > instead do this
> simple
> > > > change
> > > > >> > now
> > > > >> > > > > since
> > > > >> > > > > > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > must
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > move
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> with
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > SonataFlow,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > and then rethink all
> > > > modules
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> > > > > include
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > "org.apache.kie"
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > prefix.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Honestly,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > if we are not
> required,
> > > I'd
> > > > >> keep
> > > > >> > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > naming
> > > > >> > > > > > > > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > today.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023
> at
> > > > >> 12:54 AM
> > > > >> > > Jason
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Porter
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > <jpor...@ibm.com.invalid
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > We don’t have to
> > rename
> > > > >> > current
> > > > >> > > > > code,
> > > > >> > > > > > > but
> > > > >> > > > > > > > new
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > code
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > will
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > need
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > to be
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > org.apache
> > (sonataflow
> > > is
> > > > >> > > probably
> > > > >> > > > > > > fine).
> > > > >> > > > > > > > I
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> thinking if
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > we’re
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > going
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > rename packages
> group
> > > id
> > > > >> now,
> > > > >> > we
> > > > >> > > > > might
> > > > >> > > > > > > as
> > > > >> > > > > > > > well
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > make
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Apache
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > only
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > do
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > it once.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Jason Porter
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Software Engineer
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > He/Him/His
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > IBM
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > From: ricardo
> zanini
> > > > >> > fernandes <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ricardozan...@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Date: Thursday,
> > October
> > > > 19,
> > > > >> > > 2023 at
> > > > >> > > > > > > 11:47
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > To:
> > dev@kie.apache.org
> > > <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > dev@kie.apache.org>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL]
> > Re:
> > > > >> > > [PROPOSAL]
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Renaming
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Kogito
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > SW
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > artifacts to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > KIE/SonataFlow
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > We have org.drools,
> > > > >> org.jbpm,
> > > > >> > > hence
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > org.sonataflow.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Can't
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > keep
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > this
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ubiquity?
> > > > >> > > org.kie.apache.sonataflow
> > > > >> > > > > is
> > > > >> > > > > > > too
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > large,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > IMO.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> If
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > go for
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > org.apache.sonataflow,
> > > > then
> > > > >> > > maybe
> > > > >> > > > > > > renaming
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > everything
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> else
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > follow
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > same pattern?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19,
> 2023
> > at
> > > > >> > 2:30 PM
> > > > >> > > > > Jason
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Porter <
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > lightguar...@apache.org>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I'm +0 on this.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > If we're going to
> > > > rename
> > > > >> it
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > SonataFlow,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > should
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> not
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > make it
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> org.apache.kie.sonataflow or
> > > > >> > > > > > something
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > similar
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > under
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Apache
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > name?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On 2023/10/19
> > > 12:42:53
> > > > >> > ricardo
> > > > >> > > > > > zanini
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > fernandes
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Friends,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Since we moved
> > from
> > > > >> > "Kogito
> > > > >> > > > > > > Serverless
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Workflow"
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > "SonataFlow"
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > project
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to
> > > propose a
> > > > >> > naming
> > > > >> > > > > > change
> > > > >> > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > those
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> artifacts
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > targeting
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 10.x.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Some are *only*
> > > > >> related to
> > > > >> > > SW
> > > > >> > > > > > which
> > > > >> > > > > > > is
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> implementation
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > specifics.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > We
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > can
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > change to
> > > SonataFlow,
> > > > >> for
> > > > >> > > > > example:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Description
> > > Extension
> > > > >> > Target
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Runtime
> > development
> > > > >> tools
> > > > >> > > for
> > > > >> > > > > > > > SonataFlow
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > org.kie.kogito:kogito-quarkus-serverless-workflow-devui
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > org.sonataflow:sonataflow-quarkus-devui
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > SonataFlow
> > Add-On -
> > > > >> > Includes
> > > > >> > > > > > OpenApi
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Client,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Process
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > engine,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Knative
> Eventing
> > > > >> > > capabilities
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > org.kie.kogito:kogito-quarkus-serverless-workflow
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > org.sonataflow:sonataflow-quarkus
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Another
> renaming
> > is
> > > > >> > > targeting
> > > > >> > > > > > Kogito
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Quarkus
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add-Ons
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > to KIE
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Quarkus
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Add-Ons
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > for generic
> > > proposes
> > > > >> > (works
> > > > >> > > for
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > SonataFlow,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > jBPM,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Drools,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > etc).
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > For
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > example:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Description
> > > Extension
> > > > >> > Target
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > KIE Data Index
> > > > >> Infinispan
> > > > >> > > Add-On
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-data-index-infinispan
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > org.kie:kie-addons-quarkus-data-index-infinispan
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > KIE Data Index
> > > > >> In-memory
> > > > >> > > Add-On
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > > > org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-data-index-inmemory
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > org.kie:kie-addons-quarkus-data-index-inmemory
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > There are also
> > jBPM
> > > > >> > > specifics,
> > > > >> > > > > > > which I
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > propose:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Description
> > > Extension
> > > > >> > Target
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > jBPM Add-On for
> > > > e-mail
> > > > >> > > support
> > > > >> > > > > on
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Human
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Tasks.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-mail
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > org.jbpm:jbpm-addons-quarkus-mail
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > To keep things
> > > simple
> > > > >> for
> > > > >> > > now,
> > > > >> > > > > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > can
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > refrain
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > renaming
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > namespaces,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > but
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > GAV is
> important
> > > > since
> > > > >> we
> > > > >> > > are
> > > > >> > > > > > moving
> > > > >> > > > > > > > to
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 10.x.,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > so
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > we
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > start
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > fresh.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > If we agree, I
> > can
> > > > >> keep a
> > > > >> > > > > > > spreadsheet
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > with all
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > renames
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > share
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > with the
> > community.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers!
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe,
> > > e-mail:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > For additional
> > > > commands,
> > > > >> > > e-mail:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> dev-h...@kie.apache.org
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to