Hi, Do we need to align modules names with Java package names? On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 1:29 PM ricardo zanini fernandes < ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi! > > I'd vote for "org.apache.sonataflow" if we must keep apache in the > namespace. Adding more levels will have huge classnames in the end. Can't > we compromise? > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:27 AM Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > > > wrote: > > > I agree that this is probably the best option, as it follows the pattern > > that most Apache projects follow. Otherwise possibly someone would come > > across the artifact and start searching for sonataflow.apache.org and > not > > find anything. > > > > As you’re breaking the naming anyway, I would also opt for doing it to > the > > standard Apache way. > > > > Chris > > > > Von: Tibor Zimányi <tibor.zima...@gmail.com> > > Datum: Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024 um 09:00 > > An: dev@kie.apache.org <dev@kie.apache.org> > > Betreff: Re: [HEADS UP] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to KIE/SonataFlow > > starting > > Hi everyone, > > > > there is a problem with the sonataflow rename. Based on the INFRA ticket > > (1), we cannot use org.sonataflow, we need to release new artifacts under > > org.apache. That means, it needs to be either org.apache.sonataflow > (which > > we may need to ask permissions for) or org.apache.kie.sonataflow - for > this > > I think we may already have publishing permissions. As we are one Apache > > project - KIE, I personally vote for org.apache.kie.sonataflow. > > > > What do you think please? > > > > Best regards, > > Tibor > > > > (1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25546 > > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 5:24 PM Pere Fernandez (apache) < > > pefer...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > the Quarkus Extensions rename is moving forward. Last week we managed > to > > > merge the first PR's that renamed the extensions in* kogito-apps* (#932 > > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/932>) and the > > > rename > > > for *jBPM* & *drools* extensions in *kogito-runtimes* (#934 > > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/934>). Today > > I've > > > been looking at the *SonataFlow *(#933 > > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/933>) > extensions > > > and > > > already sent the PR's (PR#3417 > > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3417>, > > > PR#2003 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/2003 > > > > & > > > PR#1881 < > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-examples/pull/1881 > > > >) > > > the change is small and hopefully we could merge today / tomorrow, > > > so @Ricardo if you could take a look I'd appreciate it. > > > > > > I'm going to spend the next couple of days working on the final task to > > > rename the missing Kie & Kogito extensions so we can wrap up the > > renaming. > > > I expect some big PR's with this changes, but hopefully we'll have it > > ready > > > by Wednesday or so. > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > Pere > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 15:59, ricardo zanini fernandes < > > > ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey Pere! Many thanks for this work! Are you planning to rename > > > SonataFlow > > > > too? If you could do that, I would gently accept your help! > > > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 2:12 PM Pere Fernandez (apache) < > > > > pefer...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > I just wanted to let you know that today I have started the > > extension's > > > > > renaming based on the proposal's > > > > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/5s0qrznbhgxnnc1wq4vkl56chvcckr98> > > > > > spreadsheet > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gsttRcXGtwGQO469EYFDhLxJLEA7Kl3gmioR6XhGhjY/edit#gid=0 > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > I created some issues to spread the work in different areas, so the > > > work > > > > > could be tackled in parallel (if anyone can join the effort) and at > > > same > > > > > time will result in smaller PR's easier to review and test: > > > > > > > > > > - #932 < > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/932 > > >: > > > > > Rename > > > > > Quarkus Extensions in kogito-apps (ongoing) > > > > > - #933 < > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/933 > > >: > > > > > Rename SonataFlow Quarkus > > > > > Extensions in kogito-runtimes > > > > > - #934 < > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/934 > > >: > > > > > Rename > > > > > the jBPM & drools Quarkus Extensions in kogito-runtimes > > > > > - #935 < > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/935 > > >: > > > > > Rename > > > > > kie & kogito Quarkus Extensions in kogito-runtimes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I started with the extensions in *kogito-apps* repo since I think > > it's > > > > > pretty straightforward and will have less impact in the CI > > (hopefully). > > > > As > > > > > agreed, the focus is to adjust the GAVs so we produce artifacts for > > our > > > > > extension using the new groups and artifacttids, so there are no > > other > > > > > changes in the project structure, packages, folders or images names > > > > > (data-index, jobs-service & data-audit). > > > > > > > > > > I already sent some PR's (#3410 > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3410 > >, > > > > > #1997 > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1997>, > > #1877 > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-examples/pull/1877 > >) > > > so > > > > > feel free to take a look and drop any comment there. > > > > > > > > > > If everything looks good tomorrow will move forward with > > > *kogito-runtimes > > > > > *with > > > > > the jBPM & drools related extensions and addons. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > > Pere > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Tibor Zimanyi > > >
