+1

On 2025/02/17 23:22:31 Tiago Bento wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> As a final attempt to shift the focus of the Apache KIE community away
> from build systems and codebase structure and to allow us to move
> forward with a good release cadence while fostering innovation in the
> Open-Source Business Automation space, Alex and I wrote what we hope
> to be the last infrastructure-related proposal from us (for quite a
> while, at least).
> 
> We sincerely believe that, if approved, this proposal will put Apache
> KIE in a very advantageous place to welcome new contributors,
> encourage current contributors to do their best work yet and multiply
> the reach of our technology to even more users. We hope everyone
> reading this feels heard as we try to incorporate all the feedback we
> gathered since our first day inside Apache.
> 
> We opted to go for a [VOTE] directly to avoid risking an endless
> conversation again. While we understand this is not the preferred
> approach for contributing, this subject is still sensitive enough for
> us to have chosen this method, hopefully for the last time.
> 
> Tiago and Alex.
> 
> #
> # Problem scope
> 
> Recently during the many threads that were raised in this mailing
> list, it became clear that there’s a general concern about the
> direction of the codebase structure and a continued feedback against
> the monorepo-ization of the Apache KIE codebase, which seems to be
> stealing our energy and making it impossible to focus on what we all
> do best: features and innovation.
> 
> It’s also clear that the current infrastructure hasn’t been helpful.
> The level of complexity necessary to maintain the current repositories
> is holding us back from a more streamlined approach to PR checks and
> CI and, most importantly, to our releases, preventing us from
> maintaining a good cadence.
> 
> This proposal brings a compromise to the table, between the current
> poly-repo and a monorepo: a duo-repo, with one repo named `kie`,
> hosting all Java runtime code, and another repo named `kie-extras`,
> hosting everything else (including Docs, Examples, Websites, Container
> images, Editors, Web apps, Quakus Dev UIs, Jenkins release jobs etc).
> 
> The duo-repo-ization of the Apache KIE codebase will allow us to
> dramatically simplify the automations we have for PR checks, CI and
> release jobs as well as the operation for daily contributions,
> stopping the dependence we have on SNAPSHOTs, for example. The
> ultimate goal is to replace the complicated `build-chain`-based PR
> checks and the custom Jenkins framework we have for CI/releases.
> 
> #
> # What is not in scope
> 
>   - Cross-repo PRs; as it leads to systems similar to `build-chain`
> and the custom Jenkins framework. We want to avoid going in that
> direction again.
>   - Sparse-checkouts mechanism for `kie`; Due to the complexity of
> setting up something like this, and the other mechanisms that exist to
> mitigate the increase in size of the repo, this won’t be pursued
> initially.
>   - A complete review of all repositories under `apache/incubator-kie-*`
> 
> #
> # The proposal
> 
> Changes to repositories:
>   - `drools` is:
>       - Renamed to `kie`, keeping the most-starred repository we have on 
> GitHub.
>       - Updated to include `optaplanner`, `kogito-runtimes` and
> `kogito-apps`; preserving Git history.
>           - New top-level modules will be created for each repository,
> making things simpler at the beginning.
>           - Top-level modules prefixed with `drools-` go to a new
> folder called `drools`, and top-level modules prefixed with `kie-` go
> to a new folder called `kie`.
>   - `kie-tools` is:
>       - Renamed to `kie-extras`; reflecting its multi-purposed nature
> of hosting a variety of different package types
>   - `optaplanner`, `kogito-runtimes`, and `kogito-apps` are:
>       - Updated with READMEs/descriptions pointing to the new `kie` repo
>       - Archived by Apache INFRA once `kie` is fully operational
>   - `kogito-pipelines` is:
>       - Updated with a disclaimer on its README saying it’s no longer used.
>       - Archived by Apache INFRA once `kie` is fully operational
> 
> Changes to automations:
>   - Jenkins is almost completely reset, except for a few jobs
> necessary for the Release Procedure [1].
>   - Timestamped SNAPSHOTs stop being published every Sunday.
>   - Regular SNAPSHOTs stop being published every day.
>   - `apache.snapshots` repository is cleaned up so that no SNAPSHOTs
> are available anymore.
>   - PRs sent to `kie` will be checked using a new GitHub Actions
> hosted inside it and WON’T build `kie-extras`
>   - PRs sent to `kie-extras` will be checked as they already are, with
> a new step at the beginning that will build (or fetch from a cached
> GitHub Actions artifact) `kie` at a versioned commit SHA.
>   - A new weekly bot is created to update the versioned `kie` SHA at
> `kie-extras` via PR. Contributors to `kie-extras` start their week
> taking a look at it and working together to get that merged ASAP.
>   - A new release job stored in `kie-extras` is created to build and
> publish `kie` on a Release Candidate.
> 
> Communication:
>   - Apache KIE’s website and documentation are updated to reflect the
> new duo-repo structure.
> 
> ### Impact on operation and contributions
> 
>   - Contributors to `optaplanner`, `kogito-runtimes` and `kogito-apps`
> will move to `kie`
>   - PR checks will take the same time (or less, if we’re able to
> capitalize more on parallel builds, given every module is going to be
> part of the same build in Maven’s reactor).
>   - Unified Maven dependency management, less surface to manage
> external dependencies.
>   - Contributions to `kie-extras` that depend on `kie` will continue
> being bi-phased, the same way they are today with the timestamped
> SNAPSHOTs.
> 
> ### Notes on SNAPSHOTs
> 
>   - According to Apache’s guidelines on unreleased artifacts, we
> should be very conscious about our SNAPSHOT usage in regards to
> encouraging users to consume them or even to depend on them. See
> https://infra.apache.org/release-distribution.html#unreleased
>   - Users will always have access to the latest release and will be
> encouraged to step on the development itself to access the bleeding
> edge (Building 999-SNAPSHOT locally from `kie` @ `main`).
>   - Given the discrepancy between `kie` and `kie-extras`, to make CI
> simpler and not delve into cross-repo PR systems, it would be
> confusing to have some SNAPSHOTs published from `kie-extras` that are
> not aligned with SNAPSHOTs from `kie`.
>   - Given the simplified structure of the codebase, publishing
> SNAPSHOTs would encourage usage that’s either not aligned with Apache
> or with our strategy of not having cross-repo PRs. We can revisit that
> in the future if we find a justification for such. This proposal
> doesn’t want to get in the way of any future work, just establish a
> comprehensive baseline for us to evolve on top of.
> 
> #
> # Actionable items (plan)
> 
> Phase 1 (New structure)
>   - A new GitHub Actions workflow is created on `drools` for PR checks
> (without building any other repos)
>   - `optaplanner` is incorporated as a top-level folder on `drools`,
> preserving Git history
>   - `optaplanner`’s README is updated, pointing to `drools` as its new
> home. Contributions to it are frozen.
>   - `kogito-runtimes` is incorporated as a top-level folder on
> `drools`, preserving Git history
>   - `kogito-runtimes`’s README is updated, pointing to `drools` as its
> new home. Contributions to it are frozen.
>   - `kogito-apps` is incorporated as a top-level folder on `drools`,
> preserving Git history
>   - `kogito-apps`’s README is updated, pointing to `drools` as its new
> home. Contributions to it are frozen.
>   - `drools` is renamed to `kie` (GitHub redirects will make sure
> users accessing/cloning `drools` automatically go to `kie`)
>   - `kie`’s README is updated to reflect its new top-level packages.
>   - `kie-tools` is renamed to `kie-extras`.
>   - `kie-tools` has its reference to `kie` updated to a versioned
> commit SHA, at the same time as its PR checks and CI are updated to
> build `kie` prior to building itself.
> 
> Phase 2 (Cleanup)
>   - `build-chain`-based GitHub Actions are deleted from all repositories.
>   - The custom Jenkins framework jobs are removed from Jenkins
>   - Update Documentation and Websites to reflect new codebase structure
> 
> Phase 3 (Release)
>   - A new release job is created on Jenkins (hosted on `kie-extras`)
> to release Maven modules from `kie`.
>   - The Release Procedure for 10.2 is updated to accommodate the new
> codebase structure
> 
> Phase 4 (Archive Repos)
>   - kogito-pipelines, optaplanner, kogito-runtimes, and kogito-apps
> are archived by INFRA
> 
> #
> # Commitment and rough timeline
> 
> Alex and Tiago are fully committed to executing this proposal with a
> start date right after 10.1.0 is fully released (approved by IPMC and
> published to all external registries).
> 
> The rough estimate to execute is about 4 weeks; with [HEADS UP]s
> coming to the mailing list whenever a change approaches.
> 
> 10.2.0 will be the first release already with the new structure, where
> the new release jobs will be validated.
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/15V-1e62bmmWeOdFUnSJHymPYoeb0TTwp0bhxPuJn4zo
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org

Reply via email to