Sorry I thought I sent my +1 for the release last night. In any case, my
release testing has also gone well for this RC. I agree with you that we
should go ahead with 0.9.0 release and address UI proxying issues for the
various UIs that we now support in a 0.9.1 release. There are a few issues
I see in JIRA related to UI proxying but they could all be related to
KNOX-711. But certainly along with KNOX-711 we should get in a fix for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705 in a follow on release.

Sumit. 

On 4/20/16, 9:06 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote:

>My release testing has gone well but before I provide my +1 for this rc, I
>would like to discuss an issue [1] that has come to light.
>This issue primarily affects UI proxying but could theoretically affect
>service definitions as well.
>Given that there is a workaround of deploying separate topologies to avoid
>overlapping rewrite rule matching patterns, I propose that we address this
>issue in a narrowly scoped 0.9.1 release and document it as a limitation
>for 0.9.0.
>
>What are your thoughts?
>
>1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711
>
>
>On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Kevin Minder
><[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> * Verified signatures
>> * Built from source and ran/passed all unit tests
>> * Ran Groovy samples for WebHDFS, WebHCat, Oozie, HBase
>> * Basic testing of HiveServer2 support via JDBC Driver based client
>> * Basic testing of KnoxSSO with Default Knox IDP using Ambari
>> * Basic testing of Ambari UI Proxy support
>> * Basic testing of KnoxSSO+DefaultIdP+AmbariUIProxy
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/14/16, 8:53 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >All -
>> >
>> >A new candidate (rc4) for the Apache Knox 0.9.0 release is available
>>at:
>> >
>> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-0.9.0/
>> >
>> >The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>> >
>> >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git
>> >Branch v0.9.0 (git checkout -b v0.9.0)
>> >
>> >The KEYS file for signature validation is available at:
>> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/knox/KEYS
>> >
>> >The driving usecases for the 0.9.0 release have been defined as the
>> >following:
>> >1. SSO participation by applications like Ranger and Ambari while being
>> >proxied through the gateway.
>> >2. Authentication natively done by Ranger and Ambari applications while
>> >being proxied through Knox.
>> >3. the usecase of a custom application like the Knoxplorer sample can
>>now
>> >be hosted by Knox and this needs to be covered and tested with KnoxSSO.
>> >4. Default Knox authentication with form based application as KnoxSSO
>>IDP.
>> >5. any additional API support and various features and improvements.
>> >
>> >For testing KnoxSSO for Ambari with Default IDP (form-based
>> authentication):
>> >
>> 
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KNOX/Ambari+via+KnoxSSO+and+D
>>efault+IDP
>> >
>> >For testing new applications that are hosted on Knox and consuming
>>Hadoop
>> >REST APIs with KnoxSSO:
>> >https://github.com/lmccay/knoxplorer2
>> >
>> >
>> >Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox 0.9.0.
>> >The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>> >least three +1 Apache Knox PMC votes are cast.
>> >
>> >[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox 0.9.0
>> >[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> >
>> >
>> >thanks,
>> >
>> >--larry
>>

Reply via email to