Here are my official results as well: +1
* Verified signatures * Build the project from branch source and ran unit tests * Ran curl examples from the user guide for WebHDFS, WebHCat, Oozie, HBase and Yarn * Ran a sample Java client code for JDBC driver based HiveServer2 access * Basic testing of Ambari proxy UI * Basic testing of Ranger proxy UI Sumit. On 4/20/16, 9:58 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: >Very well - here are my test results: > >+1 > >* verified signatures >* built from source and ran unit tests >* ran samples for HBase, WebHDFS, WebHCat/templeton, Hive >* manually tested form-based authentication provider for KnoxSSO with >Ambari >* manually tested form-based authentication provider for KnoxSSO for Knox >hosted applications >* manually tested SAML 2 IDP (Okta) for KnoxSSO with Ambari >* manually tested SAML 2 IDP (Okta) for KnoxSSO for Knox hosted >applications >* tested webhdfs and webhcat from node.js based CLI > >Unless Kevin has some reservation about releasing 0.9.0 with KNOX-711 >outstanding, we will move forward. > > >On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Sumit Gupta <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Sorry I thought I sent my +1 for the release last night. In any case, my >> release testing has also gone well for this RC. I agree with you that we >> should go ahead with 0.9.0 release and address UI proxying issues for >>the >> various UIs that we now support in a 0.9.1 release. There are a few >>issues >> I see in JIRA related to UI proxying but they could all be related to >> KNOX-711. But certainly along with KNOX-711 we should get in a fix for >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705 in a follow on release. >> >> Sumit. >> >> On 4/20/16, 9:06 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >My release testing has gone well but before I provide my +1 for this >>rc, I >> >would like to discuss an issue [1] that has come to light. >> >This issue primarily affects UI proxying but could theoretically affect >> >service definitions as well. >> >Given that there is a workaround of deploying separate topologies to >>avoid >> >overlapping rewrite rule matching patterns, I propose that we address >>this >> >issue in a narrowly scoped 0.9.1 release and document it as a >>limitation >> >for 0.9.0. >> > >> >What are your thoughts? >> > >> >1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711 >> > >> > >> >On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Kevin Minder >> ><[email protected]> >> >wrote: >> > >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> >> * Verified signatures >> >> * Built from source and ran/passed all unit tests >> >> * Ran Groovy samples for WebHDFS, WebHCat, Oozie, HBase >> >> * Basic testing of HiveServer2 support via JDBC Driver based client >> >> * Basic testing of KnoxSSO with Default Knox IDP using Ambari >> >> * Basic testing of Ambari UI Proxy support >> >> * Basic testing of KnoxSSO+DefaultIdP+AmbariUIProxy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 4/14/16, 8:53 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >All - >> >> > >> >> >A new candidate (rc4) for the Apache Knox 0.9.0 release is available >> >>at: >> >> > >> >> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-0.9.0/ >> >> > >> >> >The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: >> >> > >> >> >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git >> >> >Branch v0.9.0 (git checkout -b v0.9.0) >> >> > >> >> >The KEYS file for signature validation is available at: >> >> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/knox/KEYS >> >> > >> >> >The driving usecases for the 0.9.0 release have been defined as the >> >> >following: >> >> >1. SSO participation by applications like Ranger and Ambari while >>being >> >> >proxied through the gateway. >> >> >2. Authentication natively done by Ranger and Ambari applications >>while >> >> >being proxied through Knox. >> >> >3. the usecase of a custom application like the Knoxplorer sample >>can >> >>now >> >> >be hosted by Knox and this needs to be covered and tested with >>KnoxSSO. >> >> >4. Default Knox authentication with form based application as >>KnoxSSO >> >>IDP. >> >> >5. any additional API support and various features and improvements. >> >> > >> >> >For testing KnoxSSO for Ambari with Default IDP (form-based >> >> authentication): >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KNOX/Ambari+via+KnoxSSO+and+D >> >>efault+IDP >> >> > >> >> >For testing new applications that are hosted on Knox and consuming >> >>Hadoop >> >> >REST APIs with KnoxSSO: >> >> >https://github.com/lmccay/knoxplorer2 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox 0.9.0. >> >> >The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of >>at >> >> >least three +1 Apache Knox PMC votes are cast. >> >> > >> >> >[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox 0.9.0 >> >> >[ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >thanks, >> >> > >> >> >--larry >> >> >> >>
