Very well - here are my test results: +1
* verified signatures * built from source and ran unit tests * ran samples for HBase, WebHDFS, WebHCat/templeton, Hive * manually tested form-based authentication provider for KnoxSSO with Ambari * manually tested form-based authentication provider for KnoxSSO for Knox hosted applications * manually tested SAML 2 IDP (Okta) for KnoxSSO with Ambari * manually tested SAML 2 IDP (Okta) for KnoxSSO for Knox hosted applications * tested webhdfs and webhcat from node.js based CLI Unless Kevin has some reservation about releasing 0.9.0 with KNOX-711 outstanding, we will move forward. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Sumit Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry I thought I sent my +1 for the release last night. In any case, my > release testing has also gone well for this RC. I agree with you that we > should go ahead with 0.9.0 release and address UI proxying issues for the > various UIs that we now support in a 0.9.1 release. There are a few issues > I see in JIRA related to UI proxying but they could all be related to > KNOX-711. But certainly along with KNOX-711 we should get in a fix for > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705 in a follow on release. > > Sumit. > > On 4/20/16, 9:06 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >My release testing has gone well but before I provide my +1 for this rc, I > >would like to discuss an issue [1] that has come to light. > >This issue primarily affects UI proxying but could theoretically affect > >service definitions as well. > >Given that there is a workaround of deploying separate topologies to avoid > >overlapping rewrite rule matching patterns, I propose that we address this > >issue in a narrowly scoped 0.9.1 release and document it as a limitation > >for 0.9.0. > > > >What are your thoughts? > > > >1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711 > > > > > >On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Kevin Minder > ><[email protected]> > >wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> * Verified signatures > >> * Built from source and ran/passed all unit tests > >> * Ran Groovy samples for WebHDFS, WebHCat, Oozie, HBase > >> * Basic testing of HiveServer2 support via JDBC Driver based client > >> * Basic testing of KnoxSSO with Default Knox IDP using Ambari > >> * Basic testing of Ambari UI Proxy support > >> * Basic testing of KnoxSSO+DefaultIdP+AmbariUIProxy > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4/14/16, 8:53 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >All - > >> > > >> >A new candidate (rc4) for the Apache Knox 0.9.0 release is available > >>at: > >> > > >> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-0.9.0/ > >> > > >> >The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >> > > >> >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git > >> >Branch v0.9.0 (git checkout -b v0.9.0) > >> > > >> >The KEYS file for signature validation is available at: > >> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/knox/KEYS > >> > > >> >The driving usecases for the 0.9.0 release have been defined as the > >> >following: > >> >1. SSO participation by applications like Ranger and Ambari while being > >> >proxied through the gateway. > >> >2. Authentication natively done by Ranger and Ambari applications while > >> >being proxied through Knox. > >> >3. the usecase of a custom application like the Knoxplorer sample can > >>now > >> >be hosted by Knox and this needs to be covered and tested with KnoxSSO. > >> >4. Default Knox authentication with form based application as KnoxSSO > >>IDP. > >> >5. any additional API support and various features and improvements. > >> > > >> >For testing KnoxSSO for Ambari with Default IDP (form-based > >> authentication): > >> > > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KNOX/Ambari+via+KnoxSSO+and+D > >>efault+IDP > >> > > >> >For testing new applications that are hosted on Knox and consuming > >>Hadoop > >> >REST APIs with KnoxSSO: > >> >https://github.com/lmccay/knoxplorer2 > >> > > >> > > >> >Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox 0.9.0. > >> >The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > >> >least three +1 Apache Knox PMC votes are cast. > >> > > >> >[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox 0.9.0 > >> >[ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > >> > > >> > > >> >thanks, > >> > > >> >--larry > >> > >
