Thanks for initiating the discussion Larry. +1 for you to be the release manager and the date looks good to me as well. I agree that this should be a bug fix release that is tightly scoped. I can¹t think of any other bugs at this time that should be added to the list (other than some docs updates that I¹ll file Jiras for), but if I find any candidates I¹ll reply to this thread.
Sumit. On 5/12/16, 11:43 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: >All - > >I believe that we need to start collecting and/or filing the JIRAs that we >need for a 0.9.1 release. There were a handful of things in 0.9.0 that we >were aware of at release time that need to have quick follow up fixes. > >Currently, we have the following three JIRAs: > > > 1. [image: Bug] KNOX-712 > submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712> > 2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711 > Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711> > 3. [image: Bug] KNOX-705 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705>Views in Ambari UI >don't > render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705> > > >I have a couple things in mind to file for the KnoxSSO default IDP form >and >will file those shortly. >My feeling is that 0.9.1 should be a bug fix release and scoped as tightly >as possible. > >New features should target 0.10.0. > >I'd like to volunteer as release manager for 0.9.1 and propose a target >release date of 6/10th. > >Thoughts? > >--larry
