All - Just an FYI - I committed the final outstanding patch last night for the 0.9.1 release and am in the process of building the first rc for testing.
I will send an email announcing its availability for testing and a VOTE once it is staged and ready to go. thanks, --larry On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 8:56 AM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > All - > > As we are closing done on 11 or so days to our target release, I thought > it would be good to provide a status. > > We have addressed a few JIRAs that have been targeted for 0.9.1 and still > have a handful to tackle. > > KNOX-711 has a patch available for review and I will be taking some time > to review and test it. This is a fundamental change to how rewrite fuels > are applied to services and therefore does require review in order to be > committed. > > At the moment, we have the following open JIRAs: > > > 1. [image: Bug] KNOX-705 > Views in Ambari UI don't render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705> > 2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711 > Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711> > 3. [image: Bug] KNOX-714 > Remove Permissive MIT License from NOTICE File > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-714> > 4. [image: Bug] KNOX-715 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-715>submitJava should > allow multiple argument via arg() > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-715> > > > I am in the process of reviewing and testing KNOX-715 and hope to commit > it today or early this week. > KNOX-714 is a no brainer to just clean up the NOTICE file. > > Also at this point, we have the following list as the total bug fixes for > 0.9.1: > > > 1. [image: Bug] KNOX-705 > Views in Ambari UI don't render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705> > 2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711 > Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711> > 3. [image: Bug] KNOX-712 > submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712> > 4. [image: Bug] KNOX-713 > Knox Shell HDFS.get.Request is Package Private > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-713> > 5. [image: Bug] KNOX-714 > Remove Permissive MIT License from NOTICE File > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-714> > 6. [image: Bug] KNOX-715 > submitJava should allow multiple argument via arg() > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-715> > 7. [image: Bug] KNOX-716 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-716>Parameter setting for > 'replayBufferSize' is no longer representing KBytes. > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-716> > > > If there are any other issues that you feel need to be addressed please > raise this as a discussion point so that we can plan accordingly. > > As we close down on this release, we should also start thinking about the > 0.10.0 (perhaps a 1.0 candidate?) release and what would be required. > > thanks, > > --larry > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Minder <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 on a bug fix 0.9.1 release targeted around June 10th. >> I agree that it should be tightly scoped and the current candidate list >> seems like a good starting point. >> >> +1 on Larry as the release manager for 0.9.1 also. >> >> > On May 12, 2016, at 3:38 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Let's see what Kevin has in mind... >> > >> > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Sounds good, Sumit! >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Sumit Gupta < >> [email protected] >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Thanks for initiating the discussion Larry. +1 for you to be the >> release >> >>> manager and the date looks good to me as well. I agree that this >> should be >> >>> a bug fix release that is tightly scoped. I can¹t think of any other >> bugs >> >>> at this time that should be added to the list (other than some docs >> >>> updates that I¹ll file Jiras for), but if I find any candidates I¹ll >> reply >> >>> to this thread. >> >>> >> >>> Sumit. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 5/12/16, 11:43 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> All - >> >>>> >> >>>> I believe that we need to start collecting and/or filing the JIRAs >> that >> >>> we >> >>>> need for a 0.9.1 release. There were a handful of things in 0.9.0 >> that we >> >>>> were aware of at release time that need to have quick follow up >> fixes. >> >>>> >> >>>> Currently, we have the following three JIRAs: >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> 1. [image: Bug] KNOX-712 >> >>>> submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() >> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712> >> >>>> 2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711 >> >>>> Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic >> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711> >> >>>> 3. [image: Bug] KNOX-705 >> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705>Views in Ambari UI >> >>>> don't >> >>>> render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service >> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I have a couple things in mind to file for the KnoxSSO default IDP >> form >> >>>> and >> >>>> will file those shortly. >> >>>> My feeling is that 0.9.1 should be a bug fix release and scoped as >> >>> tightly >> >>>> as possible. >> >>>> >> >>>> New features should target 0.10.0. >> >>>> >> >>>> I'd like to volunteer as release manager for 0.9.1 and propose a >> target >> >>>> release date of 6/10th. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thoughts? >> >>>> >> >>>> --larry >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
