+1 on a bug fix 0.9.1 release targeted around June 10th. I agree that it should be tightly scoped and the current candidate list seems like a good starting point.
+1 on Larry as the release manager for 0.9.1 also. > On May 12, 2016, at 3:38 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > > Let's see what Kevin has in mind... > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:49 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sounds good, Sumit! >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Sumit Gupta <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for initiating the discussion Larry. +1 for you to be the release >>> manager and the date looks good to me as well. I agree that this should be >>> a bug fix release that is tightly scoped. I can¹t think of any other bugs >>> at this time that should be added to the list (other than some docs >>> updates that I¹ll file Jiras for), but if I find any candidates I¹ll reply >>> to this thread. >>> >>> Sumit. >>> >>> >>> On 5/12/16, 11:43 AM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> All - >>>> >>>> I believe that we need to start collecting and/or filing the JIRAs that >>> we >>>> need for a 0.9.1 release. There were a handful of things in 0.9.0 that we >>>> were aware of at release time that need to have quick follow up fixes. >>>> >>>> Currently, we have the following three JIRAs: >>>> >>>> >>>> 1. [image: Bug] KNOX-712 >>>> submitPig does not allow multiple argument via arg() >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-712> >>>> 2. [image: Bug] KNOX-711 >>>> Global Rewrite Rules for a Topology are Problematic >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-711> >>>> 3. [image: Bug] KNOX-705 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705>Views in Ambari UI >>>> don't >>>> render when proxied by the AMBARIUI service >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-705> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have a couple things in mind to file for the KnoxSSO default IDP form >>>> and >>>> will file those shortly. >>>> My feeling is that 0.9.1 should be a bug fix release and scoped as >>> tightly >>>> as possible. >>>> >>>> New features should target 0.10.0. >>>> >>>> I'd like to volunteer as release manager for 0.9.1 and propose a target >>>> release date of 6/10th. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> --larry >>> >>> >>
