Great, thanks Larry for starting the discussion and the KIP !

May 31st target date sounds good, just to be sure, this date is when we
split 0.13 right ?

KIP-5 looks good, I will try to see whether I can find any extended classes
that might need adapter classes.

Best,
Sandeep

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:35 AM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote:

> Forgot to add the [1] to the initial mail.
>
> Enjoy...
>
> 1.
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/knox-dev/201704.
> mbox/%3CCACRbFygW6y7adt_PNJrQ8n3fCswi6F_kDO5T-rFEHJG6G5sB4Q%40mail.gmail.
> com%3E
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:45 PM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > All -
> >
> > After many recent distractions, I would like to start the scoping and
> > planning for what will likely be our 1.0.0 release.
> >
> > As discussed in [1], we will begin to repackaging/refactor master after
> > branching for an 0.13.0 release and only release 0.13.0 if the work on
> > repackaging master doesn't seem like it will make whatever date we chose
> > for the release.
> >
> > That said, I would like to limit scope to only those new features and bug
> > fixes that are absolutely necessary or low risk for breaking backward
> > compatibility.
> >
> > I propose that the following is needed:
> >
> > * A KIP (KIP-5) be created for the repackaging/refactoring work required
> > for the 1.0.0 release
> > * Determine the existing JIRAs and patches that must/can be in the
> release
> > but try and defer as many as possible
> > * Determine required improvements - I have a few security related
> > improvements in mind
> > * Write up KIPs for features that involve architectural and/or strategic
> > feature details
> > * Determine when to branch for 0.13.0 and take on double commits for
> 1.0.0
> > parity
> > * Agree on a target release date
> >
> > My initial thought is to target May 31st as the release date.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > --larry
> >
>

Reply via email to