pzampino commented on code in PR #1074:
URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/1074#discussion_r2267881974


##########
gateway-server/src/main/java/org/apache/knox/gateway/UrlEncodedFormRequest.java:
##########
@@ -77,6 +78,9 @@ private MultiMap<String> parseQueryString(String queryString) 
{
 
   @Override
   public String getParameter(String name) {
+    if(JWTFederationFilter.GRANT_TYPE.equals(name) || 
JWTFederationFilter.CLIENT_ID.equals(name) || 
JWTFederationFilter.CLIENT_SECRET.equals(name)) {
+      return super.getParameter(name);
+    }
     return queryParams.getValue(name, 0);

Review Comment:
   For proxying cases, that makes sense, but when Knox itself is the terminus, 
and the API includes form data, we end up with this unusual situation. It seems 
like perhaps we should only be using UrlEncodedFormRequest when the content 
type is "x-www-form-urlencoded"  AND Knox is proxying. When Knox is providing 
the API itself, this restriction is not necessary and this extension need not 
be applied. The trick is discerning proxying requests from "Knox-native" API 
requests.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@knox.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to