+1 built and ran debug/release tests on macso high sierra.

-david

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Dan Burkert <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 built and ran tests on macos.
>
> - Dan
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Mike Percy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I built 1.6.0-RC1 on RHEL 7 in RELEASE mode.
>>
>> - Checksums and sigs match
>> - README.txt and LICENSE.txt look good
>> - RAT check passed
>> - All tests passed except for one flaky test (delete_table-itest) and one
>> environment-related test issue (on kudu-tool-test), the latter of which I
>> filed as KUDU-2234
>> - Tested the kudu-client Maven repository jar against one of the old
>> kudu-examples example programs
>> - Performed some manual failover testing on a 10-node cluster with flash
>> disks and everything looked solid
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Mike Percy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The Apache Kudu team is happy to announce the first release candidate for
>> > Apache Kudu 1.6.0.
>> >
>> > Apache Kudu 1.6.0 is a minor release that offers many improvements and
>> > fixes since the prior release.
>> >
>> > The is a source-only release. The artifacts have been staged here:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kudu/1.6.0-RC1/
>> >
>> > Java convenience binaries in the form of a Maven repository are staged
>> > here:
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekudu-1017
>> >
>> > It is tagged in Git as 1.6.0-RC1 and the corresponding git hash is the
>> > following:
>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kudu.git;a=commit;h=
>> > 7e28dfc728e54e82d6cbc11fdcd4b9e62f2dfd66
>> >
>> > The release notes can be found here:
>> > https://github.com/apache/kudu/blob/1.6.0-RC1/docs/release_notes.adoc
>> >
>> > The KEYS file to verify the artifact signatures can be found here:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/kudu/KEYS
>> >
>> > I'd suggest going through the README and the release notes, building
>> Kudu,
>> > and running the unit tests. Testing out the Maven repo would also be
>> > appreciated.
>> >
>> > The vote will run until Tuesday, December 5th at 11PM PDT. We'd normally
>> > run a vote for 3 full days but since we're headed into the weekend now
>> > let's do 4 days instead.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Mike
>> >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to