As Karunakar has said, he wrote the original patch for ICU 2.2, which
worked straight up on 2.6. It was with his permission that I sent it for
inclusion.
Karunakar, it would be great it we can work on this together. We are
already looking on the state table for boudary analysis and for
optimising the number of calls to the font's tables, to make it faster.
As the hooks for 3.4 are slightly different, we have started working
from the Khmer module.
By the way, the Indic ICU module still have some fix-mes around that
could improve its performance, making less calls to the font's tables.
It would also be great to work on this.
Eike, when could the upgrade to 3.4 take place? 2.0.1 ?
Javier
Guntupalli Karunakar wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:17:42 +0200
Eike Rathke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm investigating an upgrade to ICU 3.4 or later for OOoLater. Of
the patches we apply to the ICU I want to get rid of as many as
possible. Currently there is an area of features added that is not
present in an upstream ICU. This is:
Dzongkha support, which was OOo issue 38617
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36817
and is related to general Tibetan layout support, which is (funny
number coincidence) ICU bug 3617
http://bugs.icu-project.org/cgibin/icu-bugs?findid=3617
I just added my comment there. As Javier Sola contributed our ICU
2.6 patch and also helped Khmer support find its way into upstream
ICU, may I ask you, Javier, to prepare a patch for upstream ICU to
include Tibetan/Dzongkha support? Then we would at least have all
feature patches in an upstream ICU and wouldn't have to bother with
them.
I had written the module to Tibetan/Dzongkha when working on with OO
1.1.3, will rework it with 3.4 .
Karunakar
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
