Hello Reshat, > > All the projects i'm seeing so far have only 1 ISO code in them. So > crh-tt would be a first it appears. Despite the fact that the alphabet > i'm planning on using will provide orthography that will be very > similar to Crimean Tatar, i'm 50-50 on whether crh and tt should be > separate projects. There are advantages and disadvantages. If you guys > lean towards one crh-tt project, then i guess we can start off w/ that. We usually respect the ISO codes, and you were right in your observations. Here is what I suggest, but that needs to be validated by the NLC leads: we could open a native-lang project with two names, tt and crh. We did this with the Brazilian project at the time, "br" and "br-pt". Then later one the project can split. What do you think?
Best, Charles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
