Hi Rafaella, Ivo, all I would like to know how the integration of our changes on Pootle will be done. Just to understand and try to figure if we could have a better process.
Last time for the 3.0 changes I've done in time in the cws for the UI were not integrated, see this issues for example: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91864 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91863 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91847 And I've to wait since August 08 to see the correction in March or April 09... So what would be the best for the l10n teams to make sure the corrections are integrated and for the integration team to have less hurdle and missing risks, considering the short time and the emergency of our fixes: - work only on a clean .sdf file (the complete one we have on the issue is not clean as some corrections have been integrated after gsicheck) and provide the corrections via a .sdf containing the corrections only - work only on Pootle (but as seen above some corrections are left apart) so there is may be an integration issue to solve here - work on .po files provided through an issue (we did that at the very begining if I remember well - ? Currently the process I use is to correct first the .po files, then upload them in Pootle, then correct the .sdf file, then create a new .sdf file, not to mention that I've not yet filled issues to track the changes and see if they are fixed in the master. It's a lot of duplicated work and I'm sure that we can enhance that way of work for all teams implied in the process. Kind regards Sophie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
