Hi Rafaella, Rafaella Braconi wrote: > Hi Sophie, >> >> ok, I miss that part. I think that I will write a FAQ for those very >> important parts that can be forgot from one localization round to >> another. Do you think it could be useful ? Something like >> - Do I submit a complete .sdf >> - To whom do I assign the issue >> - when do I open an issue >> - where is gsicheck >> - is it possible to gsicheck on Pootle >> - etc. >> > well, we do have already wikis such as > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_for_3.1 > where you can find information on how to deliver sdf, where to find > gsicheck .... > > and a checklist: > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/NLC:ReleaseChecklist > > Instead of creating a new one, we could add the missing information or > even thinking of restructuring the current ones....
Yes, you're right there is already all the needed information. I guess I need to put some reminders on my own list ;) >>>> >>> Yes, sure. The current process is far from perfect and I'm thankful for >>> any idea that can help us simplifying it :-) >>> Just 3 ideas that come into my mind are: >>> >>> 1) the sdf file that needs to be corrected is the sdf file which results >>> out of the gsi check. In order not to have to fix those errors both in >>> pootle and in the sdf, I would encourage all teams to use the >>> verification checks in Pootle. And I am sure that we can ask to >>> customize these checks... >>> >> >> ok. However under the Chek option in Pootle there is a lot of check that >> can be made, and some are shown as errors however it's language >> dependent. What are the most important? >> > the important verification checks are currently reported in the Pootle > User Guide: > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Pootle_User_Guide#Verification_checks Thank you, I missed also this list it seems. Kind regards Sophie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
