> On Aug. 4, 2016, 7:03 p.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-driver-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/driver/jdbc/JDBCDriver.java, 
> > line 1041
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50600/diff/6/?file=1461126#file1461126line1041>
> >
> >     will driver status cancelled be different from query status cancelled ?

Removed duplication. Now boolean is not there, only enum check everywhere.


> On Aug. 4, 2016, 7:03 p.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/QueryDriverStatusUpdateListener.java,
> >  line 27
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50600/diff/6/?file=1461134#file1461134line27>
> >
> >     Should we name it DriverQueryStatusUpdateListener

That would sound like a listener for driver's status updates instead of a 
listener for query's driver-states-updates.


> On Aug. 4, 2016, 7:03 p.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/query/QueryContext.java,
> >  line 495
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50600/diff/6/?file=1461137#file1461137line495>
> >
> >     We dont need this anymore?

This method was unused.


> On Aug. 4, 2016, 7:03 p.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/query/QueryExecutionServiceImpl.java,
> >  line 820
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50600/diff/6/?file=1461140#file1461140line820>
> >
> >     Should we Remove Async from name ?

There's already a StatusPoller. The name `StatusUpdater` would be confusing. 
Hence added `Async`.


> On Aug. 4, 2016, 7:03 p.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/query/QueryExecutionServiceImpl.java,
> >  line 825
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50600/diff/6/?file=1461140#file1461140line825>
> >
> >     Should we optimize in this case ? updateState() will again ask the 
> > driver for status though driver already sent the updated status

Optimized by adding a boolean and overriding the method.


> On Aug. 4, 2016, 7:03 p.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-driver-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/driver/jdbc/JDBCDriver.java, 
> > line 993
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/50600/diff/6/?file=1461126#file1461126line993>
> >
> >     should we remove registerForCompletionNotification method from drivers 
> > and rely on QueryContext.registerStatusUpdateListener()?
> >     
> >     Let notification be realtime only for PUSH type drivers and let PULL 
> > type drivers rely on status poller to update status and trigger 
> > notifictaion (we ll be removing the extra polling thread from Hive in this 
> > case.. don't think its useful anyway for hive queries)

This change might change the functionality of `execute with timeout` for hive 
queries. Didn't want to change that. We can certainly pick it up seperately.


- Rajat


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50600/#review144728
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 4, 2016, 6:30 p.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/50600/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 4, 2016, 6:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-1243
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1243
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   lens-driver-es/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/driver/es/ESDriver.java 
> 8a4f4105ad6ffc75445e5e10a51f6fbd4f5f1d3f 
>   lens-driver-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/driver/hive/HiveDriver.java 
> 1326611d01e7a9b4f58877435f36b1391ca178b2 
>   
> lens-driver-hive/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/driver/hive/TestRemoteHiveDriver.java
>  6dff173e26993e40e3cb82622be8173359f92592 
>   lens-driver-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/driver/jdbc/JDBCDriver.java 
> bebb9ae9a4d694f224f0ec907df166880e0cf5b8 
>   
> lens-driver-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/driver/jdbc/TestColumnarSQLRewriter.java
>  12fa6f0328242b1bd06ff0397b2f2a3a9dec010d 
>   
> lens-driver-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/driver/jdbc/TestJdbcDriver.java
>  e7636d2e631cf86021af398ee31300441a335096 
>   lens-driver-jdbc/src/test/resources/hive-site.xml 
> b497ca19b14811ecb4474b7f9bf6dec2bdf0b036 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/AbstractLensDriver.java
>  f1d844a1987d7f7990b2e10f03d2e3af8e0294e0 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/DriverQueryStatus.java
>  2374c1e4b2737a0d1ea7123232800413baa9a560 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/LensDriver.java
>  95ea3608e612aff44ec78eee003c05ccd3068ffb 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/QueryCompletionListener.java
>  3713b5156e2cfc20528d9b3b9a6f9b117daeb284 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/QueryDriverStatusUpdateListener.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/StatusUpdateMethod.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/query/QueryContext.java
>  2641b606faa20943a5f3b9de9b729380a35e8c25 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/MockDriver.java
>  59f85691d08e7deb5e3b5892b3ffc729265874d8 
>   lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/LensServerConf.java 
> e977ebd82118307bdbfd20be762a523337da4788 
>   lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/query/LensServerDAO.java 
> 47159b568e9eff2f39ede9839f278441f0305d1f 
>   
> lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/query/QueryExecutionServiceImpl.java
>  84dcecda0970d2756a943522a5876117daa71409 
>   
> lens-server/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/server/query/TestQueryService.java 
> 9f40a014bebdfc6f0ff7ea3d7a21baacc890018d 
>   lens-server/src/test/resources/hive-site.xml 
> 94c5012821330e1a78aad2a7fdfca0cc1d0fade2 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50600/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rajat Khandelwal
> 
>

Reply via email to