> On Feb. 21, 2017, 7:11 a.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/MaxCoveringFactResolver.java,
> >  line 156
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/diff/1/?file=1640583#file1640583line156>
> >
> >     Removed ?

This is being calculated unnecessary.


- Lavkesh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/#review166126
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 21, 2017, 10:10 a.m., Lavkesh Lahngir wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 21, 2017, 10:10 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-1391
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1391
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> MaxCoveringFactResolver and LeastPartitionResolver review comments
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/CandidateTablePruneCause.java
>  c7f2047 
>   
> lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/LeastPartitionResolver.java
>  153df24 
>   
> lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/MaxCoveringFactResolver.java
>  4664cde 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/StorageCandidate.java 
> fca86ec 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lavkesh Lahngir
> 
>

Reply via email to