> On Feb. 21, 2017, 11:19 a.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/LeastPartitionResolver.java,
> >  line 70
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/diff/2/?file=1640673#file1640673line70>
> >
> >     This should be done at candidate level and not at storage candidate 
> > level. 
> >     Candidate.getParticipatingPartitions().size()

Yeah. makes sense.. And the total size is equal to the addition of all the 
child parition sizes.


> On Feb. 21, 2017, 11:19 a.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/MaxCoveringFactResolver.java,
> >  line 125
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/diff/2/?file=1640674#file1640674line125>
> >
> >     passing null ? 
> >     Should pass the incomplete partition details . This info will be stored 
> > in CandidateTablePruneCause#incompletePartitions and will be used for error 
> > message construction.

hmm. This is at storageCandidate level not at candidate level.


> On Feb. 21, 2017, 11:19 a.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/StorageCandidate.java, 
> > line 544
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/diff/2/?file=1640675#file1640675line544>
> >
> >     Why this comment is dropped ?

Yeah.. I will put that again.


> On Feb. 21, 2017, 11:19 a.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/StorageCandidate.java, 
> > lines 72-75
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/diff/2/?file=1640675#file1640675line72>
> >
> >     Older comments seem more readable. Can you check once.

Yes.. I will undo it.


- Lavkesh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/#review166148
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 21, 2017, 11:19 a.m., Lavkesh Lahngir wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 21, 2017, 11:19 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-1391
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1391
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> MaxCoveringFactResolver and LeastPartitionResolver review comments
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/CandidateTablePruneCause.java
>  c7f2047 
>   
> lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/LeastPartitionResolver.java
>  153df24 
>   
> lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/MaxCoveringFactResolver.java
>  4664cde 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/StorageCandidate.java 
> fca86ec 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56858/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lavkesh Lahngir
> 
>

Reply via email to