-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29881/#review68875
-----------------------------------------------------------



lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/GroupbyResolver.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29881/#comment113386>

    Make another method `isConstantsUsed(exprAST)` which calls 
`isConstantsUsed(exprAST, false)`. The reason being the method with 2 arguments 
is recursive, The calling function which is just going to start recursion 
should need no info about arguments passed between recursive calls.



lens-cube/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/TestCubeRewriter.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29881/#comment113388>

    +1



lens-cube/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/TestCubeRewriter.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29881/#comment113390>

    test cases for constants inside measures too?


- Rajat Khandelwal


On Jan. 20, 2015, 12:46 p.m., Sushil Mohanty wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29881/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 20, 2015, 12:46 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens and Amareshwari Sriramadasu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-131
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-131
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When constants get projected the queries by default they were being added to 
> group by. Such queries fail with No Such Column error.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/GroupbyResolver.java 
> 2531c49 
>   lens-cube/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/TestCubeRewriter.java 
> cb70b66 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29881/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested with queries with different types of constants projected and rewriter 
> skipping them in group by. Added unit test for the same.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sushil Mohanty
> 
>

Reply via email to