> On Feb. 17, 2015, 3:38 p.m., Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote:
> > bin-dist-files/README, line 57
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/31116/diff/1/?file=866324#file866324line57>
> >
> >     I know we are also creating a deb file. Do we intend to make it 
> > available as a conveninent binary ? If so, we should have notes on how to 
> > setup using deb, else you can ignore.
> >     
> >     In general there needs to documentation on how deb can be used for 
> > installation, but that can be taken up in an independent jira and not a 
> > blocker for release.

Yes. Debians are not part of binary distribution as of now. There is mention of 
debians in 
http://lens.incubator.apache.org/developer/contribute.html#Building_from_source 
doc. We can put a separate section and add more details about.


> On Feb. 17, 2015, 3:38 p.m., Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote:
> > src/site/apt/releases/release-history.apt, line 29
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/31116/diff/1/?file=866341#file866341line29>
> >
> >     Why is this in release history and not in README ? Should we state why 
> > it is excluded as well ?

Added the reason and put in README as well.


- Amareshwari


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31116/#review72721
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 18, 2015, 5:25 a.m., Amareshwari Sriramadasu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31116/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 18, 2015, 5:25 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens, Chris Douglas and Srikanth Sundarrajan.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-311
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-311
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changes include :
> - Change source release artifact name to include apache-lens. Changed 
> lens-parent to apache-lens.
> - Add exclusion for org.acplt:oncrpc in apache-release profile
> - Add LICENSE and NOTICE in war packaging
> - Update README.md for source distribution
> - Update bin-dist-files/README for binary distribution
> 
> Have some questions :
> - LICENSE and NOTICE in lens-server.war looks the following. Is this 
> acceptable?
> $ ls webapp/lens-server/
> META-INF/ WEB-INF/  static/
> 
> $ ls webapp/lens-server/META-INF/
> MANIFEST.MF  maven/       
> 
> $ ls webapp/lens-server/WEB-INF/
> classes/          lib/              log4j.properties  web.xml 
> 
> $ ls webapp/lens-server/WEB-INF/classes/
> META-INF/                   lens-build-info.properties  
> lensserver-default.xml      lenssession-default.xml     org/
> 
> $ ls webapp/lens-server/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/
> DEPENDENCIES  LICENSE         NOTICE
> 
> - Is it ok to have README file README.md  for source distribution?
> - bin-dist-files folder is included in src distribution. Is it acceptable?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   README.md 07a3249 
>   bin-dist-files/README 3e74fb9 
>   lens-api/pom.xml b955c1a 
>   lens-cli/pom.xml 26adc54 
>   lens-client/pom.xml e56df03 
>   lens-cube/pom.xml 274d1ea 
>   lens-dist/pom.xml ddebf16 
>   lens-driver-hive/pom.xml be0c1b7 
>   lens-driver-jdbc/pom.xml daab50d 
>   lens-examples/pom.xml 2163785 
>   lens-ml-lib/pom.xml 3cdca92 
>   lens-query-lib/pom.xml 95d9d93 
>   lens-regression/pom.xml d506eaa 
>   lens-server-api/pom.xml f490dee 
>   lens-server/pom.xml 0986ab9 
>   lens-storage-db/pom.xml fb35e12 
>   pom.xml 38d1693 
>   src/site/apt/developer/contribute.apt 91e7b81 
>   src/site/apt/lenshome/install-and-run.apt 6031cf9 
>   src/site/apt/releases/release-history.apt f5f6139 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31116/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified packaging is fine by untarring the distribution. Will do some more 
> testing and update here.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Amareshwari Sriramadasu
> 
>

Reply via email to