On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 20:23, Michael Wechner wrote: > Rolf Kulemann wrote: > > >On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 10:36, Torsten Schlabach wrote: > > > > > >>>>It helps a lot > >>>>to clean Lenya first (./build.sh clean) because then the dependencies > >>>>are being resolved from scratch. > >>>> > >>>> > >>I agree. The trunk is not a sandbox IMO. I usually try to make really sure > >>my changes are atomic and work before I check them in. But of course > >>nobody is perfect! > >> > >> > > > >Do not worry dude. Please keep on your contributions! There are no > >mistakes we can not revert. > > > > > > it's not about being able to revert > > >That people think that the UNSTABLE (1.4) trunk should be used in > >production, is a bit crazy. > > > > it's not about using 1.4-dev in production right now, > but the goal is to use it in production and how to get there. > > > Projects, which decide to use our as > >unstable decalared trunk in production should switch there project > >managers or at least there development strategy. > > > > > > that's not what the thread is all about > > >Only official releases should used in production. > > > > > > well, 1.2.0 was a release but couldn't be considered very "stable". > And I would assume that's what will be happening with 1.4.0 as well, but > I think we should try to prevent this.
Having a stable trunk (1.4) is more a question of which features should be part of a "stable" 1.4. IIRC there was a discussion on a 1.4 feature list, which was never discussed to the end. I guess that is where to start again. -- Rolf Kulemann --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
