On 2/8/06, Josias Thoeny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Basically we're trying to unify documents and assets (from Lenya 1.2), > right?. I could also imagine to call everything "document" instead of > "asset". > For me it's more natural to call a JPEG a "document", than to call an > XHTML document an "asset". But it's a matter of personal preference...
"Document" is already well-defined. "Asset" was defined in previous versions of Lenya. Using either term for the generic will confuse people. I think having terms that imply the XML vs. Non-XML distinction is important because Lenya is XML-based and must treat XML differently than non-XML. The following snippet does not make sense to me, and should break Cocoon: <map:generate src="image.gif"/> <map:transform src="mytransform.xsl"> <map:serialize type="binary"/> We are moving Assets to the top-level of Content as siblings to Documents. (If we are not, this discussion is almost pointless.) A generic term for all children of Content, both Documents and Assets, would be very useful. "Resource" and "ContentItem" are the popular candidates. solprovider --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
