El mié, 08-02-2006 a las 12:01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > On 2/8/06, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > El mié, 08-02-2006 a las 12:37 +0100, J. Wolfgang Kaltz escribió: > > > Andreas Hartmann schrieb: > > > That's why I favor explicitly having the word "content" in whatever > > > terminology we use to describe pieces of content. Thus my proposal a > > > while back (http://wiki.apache.org/lenya/ProposalContentModel), where > > > "ContentItem" is a piece of content (or ContentNugget, or whatever), and > > > a Document is a collection of such pieces. > > Ok, for me the above site is awesome and I agree as well on content item > > because item = nugget. Nugget is just shorter as "ContentItem", why not > > "Item". ;-) The only thing still hurting me is the document. You say "a > > Document is a collection of such pieces" so why not call it > > "ContentCollection" or "collection"? > > That page tries to redefine Document as a Page, then gets really > confused when Documents (Pages) can contain multiple Documents (units > of Content). > > One more time: a "Document" is the internal term for "a unit of > information formatted as XML". A "Page" is a "response to a request > by a visitor formatted as HTML." Visitors never see "Documents".
I think I should just leave it like this, but: page -> why that is only html? What is the relationship between document and pages? Why "a unit of information formatted as XML" can contain other "units of information formatted as XML" (documents can contain other documents, or)? salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler COO Spain Wyona Inc. - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
