Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Re the guidelines in particular my point was that we start with a clean
sheet and use the Forrest guidelines
for inspiration so I don't see any reason why we cannot progress there
step by step, e.g. starting with an index/contents.
Here we go again.
...and that is exactly the point.
I and other do not see any reason why to do it step by step. Like Gregor
said because we can is not a reason. I still do not see any reason why
we have to do it like *you* want.
It would help this community if you drop your position of a blank paper
since you are the *only* one that supports it where other started the
real discussion about guidelines.
+1
Now a "stable trunk policy" in combination with a branch policy in our
guidelines may have prevented this, don't you think?
rapid development causes instability, pretty much by definition. the
problem here is not that trunk is unstable at times but that the 1.4
branch should have happened a long time ago, but did not. which lured /
forced people into relying on trunk for their business, which is wrong.
...but not if *one* person is vetoing all the time. That is burning the
one that is proposing because she needs to re-do the whole process again
and again from different angles.
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
