On 5/8/07, Gregor J. Rothfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Wechner wrote:
> my concern is that you don't want to express why you think Bob earns to
> become a committer.
>
> You might remember that the ASF is about openess and transparency, so
> what's so difficult about
> writing down where you see the qualities of Bob?
>
> You already started with one quality: Bob has been around for some time
> So what other qualities do you see?
michi, your behavior is inappropriate. if you want to hold forth on
policy, come join the PMC. publicly discussing the merits of a valued
member of our community is very immature and insensitive. you know as
well as anyone that we don't do that out of respect for the person under
consideration.
i expect more from a member of the asf, frankly.
that said i fully endorse bob as a lenya committer.
As a bystander, this vote does seem odd. Your project guidelines[1]
state that these votes take place on the private@ list to allow
open/frank discussion.
So, is this vote for real (against your own policy) or is it just ceremonial?
FWIW, I think you guys should probably re-address your policy
independent of this particular vote.
--tim
[1] - http://lenya.apache.org/guidelines.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
