On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 11:38 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: ... > > Yes, agree that is even better since it is more efficient. > > > >>> 3) Populate the file from step 2 with java objects that are in the > >>> request. > >>> > >>> Where 1 is a match of its own (for caching reasons) and 2 and 3 in one > >>> match. > >>> > >>> The menu should be independent from the main aggregation. Actually the > >>> whole main aggregation > >> [...] > >> > >>> should be done in a more flexible way via a template that will get the > >>> parts it needs. > >>> This way it would be as well possible to extend it more > >>> easy without touching the sitemap. > >> Big +1. > > > > Will have a look and try to come up with something simple. > > When should we change this? RC1 / RC2 / 1.4.1 ?
I am not sure, but I would not make it a blocker, since it would need much testing. I would first test it local and if it works I will ask to lift the code freeze. In theory we can reuse the forrest dispatcher, but that as well means we would need to use the locationmap (not bad as all). http://forrest.apache.org/docs_0_80/locationmap.html salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
