Thorsten Scherler schrieb: [...]
> Actually for me that "every non-trivial operation requires offloading to > java code" is a benefit since it keeps the heavy logic out of the > templates. I guess we all have seen once in our life a jsp that > contained an actual java class within, well let alone jsp and look in > some of our xsp that are nearly doing it. > > The benefit "outsourcing" this operation to java objects is the > re-usability and the reduction of complexity. I lately developed some > components for a customer in java flow and must admit it is heaps > cleaner then js. Sure you can use java objects in js, but who really > wants to program in js if you can do it directly in java. > > Having my flow in java I followed a bean approach to pass the objects to > the view and could test all the non trivial operations with junit. If we > allow too much in the view we have not the benefit of testing with > junit. I'd love to read more mails like this. :) -- Andreas -- Andreas Hartmann, CTO BeCompany GmbH http://www.becompany.ch --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
