Joern Nettingsmeier schrieb: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: [...]
>> Further it would be possible to have url specific extension of extra >> content and/or extra functionality. Imagine I do not want the breadcrumb >> or the lanuageselector on some pages but on other I do. Now I always get >> this parts, paying the price that Dominique has described. > > let's be careful not to stash too much into the URL space.... the > flexibility would be a bonus, but awkward URLs can be a problem. plus if > we export too many internal features to the outside via URLs, we might > open ourselves to exploits and DoSes. > for instance, the SVG flag rendering is a potential DoS already, because > it's so expensive in terms of cpu cycles. we need to avoid a situation > where a malicious site visitor can trigger all kinds of cpu hogs by > tinkering with the request URL. IIUC Thorsten didn't mean to code anything in the URL, but choose a different template and thus different navigation elements depending on the current URL, resource type, or whatever (e.g., display /news/* withouth the news sidebar). -- Andreas -- Andreas Hartmann, CTO BeCompany GmbH http://www.becompany.ch --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
