On 11/16/07, Jürgen Ragaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am 15.11.2007 um 22:40 schrieb Thorsten Scherler: > > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > >> Jürgen Ragaller schrieb: > >>> The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11 > >>> release can > >>> be read at: > >>> http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon- > >>> version-dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html > >> > >> A Cocoon 2.1.11 release in December would be great for 2.0. > >> > >> Did we already decide which version to use for 2.0 RC1? > > > > No. > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lenya/meetings/release-2.0/lenya-irc- > > rc1.html?revision=595467 > > > > That is the reason why Jürgen started the thread on cocoon. # > > > > We need to decide this ASAP (before the next RC). > > > > With a 2.1.11 release perspective in december, I think using a svn- > version for RC1 / 2... (595020) makes sense. > > WDYT? > > Jürgen
Cocoon-2.1.11 includes the fix for the HTTP Serializer correctly setting status codes. That fix is critical for properly working websites. Websites seem to be the primary use of our CMS so all releases of Lenya should include this fix. (I believe) Any official release should use only gold versions of dependencies, not dev versions. We should schedule the freeze for the next 2.0 RC to start a few days after Cocoon-2.1.11 is released. For the same reason, we should plan to release Lenya-1.2.6 with Cocoon-2.1.11 as soon as possible. solprovider --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
