On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 16:01 -0500, Bob Harner wrote: ... > > Anyway I thought about the whole cocoon stuff a bit and asked myself > > whether it makes sense to ship WITHOUT cocoon. We only recommend a > > certain version/revision number. > > > > Meaning the user would have to grep a version of cocoon himself. Would > > certainly slim down the release (~100mb!). > > > > Wdyt? > > IMHO for now I think we should stick to the original plan of including > the latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0. If > Cocoon 2.1.11 is actually released before Lenya 2.0 comes out, then > great, we can revisit the decision at that time. And if Lenya 2.0 is > released first, then we can certainly do a quick 2.0.1 release > immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released.
We have a split situation ATM. Some of us want the trunk of cocoon and other a fixed release. I can understand both situations but we need to come to a consensus ASAP. My suggestion to not ship cocoon was an intention to overcome this split pot. However solprovider perfectly points out the pros and cons, thanks Paul. I see them more or less like him. The best would be to include just some jars that we need from cocoon and nothing more. Anyway since we have to get this release quickly out of the door I tend to agree on Bobs position (on which we already agreed on this list). - latest released version of Cocoon (2.1.10) in Lenya 2.0 - instructions how to use a different version of cocooon (like trunk), which is very easy thanks to the build properties. - quick 2.0.1 release immediately after Cocoon 2.1.11 is released WDYT? salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
