On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 09:07 +0100, Jürgen Ragaller wrote: > Good morning > > Am 15.11.2007 um 22:40 schrieb Thorsten Scherler: > > > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > >> Jürgen Ragaller schrieb: > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> The (just started) discussion about a possible cocoon 2.1.11 > >>> release can > >>> be read at: > >>> http://www.nabble.com/lenya-2.0-release-preparation---cocoon- > >>> version-dependency-%282.1.11-%29-tf4807717.html > >> > >> A Cocoon 2.1.11 release in December would be great for 2.0. > >> > >> Did we already decide which version to use for 2.0 RC1? > > > > No. > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lenya/meetings/release-2.0/lenya-irc- > > rc1.html?revision=595467 > > > > That is the reason why Jürgen started the thread on cocoon. # > > > > We need to decide this ASAP (before the next RC). > > > > With a 2.1.11 release perspective in december, I think using a svn- > version for RC1 / 2... (595020) makes sense. > > WDYT?
Yeah, I agree. Anyway I thought about the whole cocoon stuff a bit and asked myself whether it makes sense to ship WITHOUT cocoon. We only recommend a certain version/revision number. Meaning the user would have to grep a version of cocoon himself. Would certainly slim down the release (~100mb!). Wdyt? salu2 > > Jürgen > > > null-oder-eins GmbH Zürich > web & graphic design > > www.null-oder-eins.ch > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skype: callto://ragaller > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
