Hi Lenya Devs,
Does it mean that we have to remove all binary libraries before we can
do the new release ?
If yes: Would it be good to use maven instead of ant ?
I'm not familiar with maven, but it seems to that it will take some
time to do it.
If we want to release soon, I think it would be good if we can move
this step to a later release.
WDYT
Rudolf
On 12/16/2012 08:42 AM, Rudolf Korhummel wrote:
Hi Lenya Devs,
I would like to start a discussion about the possibility to release
2.1
Our last release was about 20 month ago and the activity in the
community is low so a new release in the near future would be a good
thing to reactivate the project.
From MPOV we don't need much new features , but a new state of the
art
design of the default publication would be necessary. It might also
be
useful to have a simple publication which can be used by new users
to
build there publications on top.
WDYT ?
Are there some devs around who can help ? I think I will have time
after
christmas to work on this.
Best
Rudolf
There's been quite a bit of discussion about releases recently. I'd
have to do some digging to find out which list it was on: infra,
board, or members. Basically it came down to that source releases
shouldn't include binaries in them, at least not binary libraries.
Our releases contain all of those libraries, so it would go against
that. I'll have to spend some time tracking down what the decision
was. Using something like Maven obviously removes that problem.
Richard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lenya.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lenya.apache.org
