On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, dwb wrote:

> Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> | All the English dictionaries are based on an old version of the Aspell
> | dictionary.  And has many problems with it.  The latest version corrects
>
> The en_GB dictionary used for OOo is so extensively reworked including the
> use of other reliable sources for British English that I do not believe
> that it can be considered as being based on the Aspell dictionary any
> longer. The original one was, I agree, but the current version is
> completely reworked.

In that case than the en_GB should not be resynced but the en_US and en_CA
should.

> | almost all the problems.  Aspell dictionaries are based on SCOWL which is
> | a combination of several high quality word lists available on the net.
> | The end results is a very high quality and complete word list.  The word
> | lists are currently available in several spellings (en_US, en_GB with -ise
> | spelling, en_GB with -ize spelling, and en_CA).  The only possible problem
>
> The en_GB version contains both -ise and -ize versions of words. The reason
> for this decision is that there are two schools of thought in the UK and
> the choice of which to use is a personal or house preference and neither is
> wrong.

I also provide a dictionary which uses both.  I think it is better to only
include one spelling to promote consistent spelling.

> | The Aspell English dictionary is available at
> | http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/en/.  In order to view the word lists
> | you will need the prezip-bin or word-list-compress utility distributed
> | with Aspell.  A script is included which will generate the word list from
> | the SCOWL source which is available at http://wordlist.sourceforge.net/.
> |
> | I strongly suggest that the OO dictionaries are resynced with the
> | latest version of the Aspell dictionaries.
>
> Regarding en_GB I'm not sure of the merit in doing this. We spent many
> hundreds of man hours cleaning it up in the first place. It may be worth
> running a cross-check to find errors (both ways) though.

Again.  What I said for en_US and en_CA holds.  For en_GB probably not.
However, if you have the time I would appreciate it if you could run a
cross check like you suggested.

I will post Myspell dictionaries generated from the Aspell ones latter
today.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to