Hi Dmitri, Dmitri Gabinski wrote:
> Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:07:34 +0100, Simon Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > писал(а): > >> Does that mean we have to modify the format of the existing Myspell >> dictionaries? > > > I can answer that even before Laci would bother. I do use Hunspell (I > switch off MySpell) with the existing MySpell dictionaries. No need to > modify. But you do have to modify them (well, to modify affix files) > if you want to use the full power of HunSpell. However, I — developing > a Belarusian spellcheck module — still don't take such steps (since I, > regretfully, don't have enough time to dig deeply into Hunspell's new > features). OK, great! The Dutch Myspell dictionary already contains the NOSPLITSUGS option, which was also supported in Myspell in OOo 1.1.4/5 but unfortunately not in OOo 2.0. It's good to know that it will work again with the integration of Hunspell. I am very excited about the compounding feature in Hunspell, this is something often requested by Dutch users. We will definitely use it! > >> Or is it possible to use different spell checkers, e.g. if there is more >> than one language in a document, >> one language might be checked using Hunspell and another using Myspell. > > > Hunspell and MySpell can be used simultaneously, but what's the reason? Given your explanation, I agree there is none. Thanks! -- Vriendelijke groet, Simon Brouwer. ### nl.openoffice.org ### --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
