Hi! On 2005-12-23 at 08:55 -0500 Kevin B. Hendricks sent off:
So IMHO, we should remove MySpell completely from the source tree when Hunspell is integrated.That will remove the duplication and prevent confusion. Then we would have NO Myspell vs HunSpell issues in dictionary.lst
there will be confusion for dict downloaders who use older OOo versions (just supporting myspell) and dict downloaders who use newer OOo versions (using hunspell). At the time where dictionaries which will use hunspell specific features and there is no seperation of my/hunspell dicts, users of myspell OOo versions will not be happy anymore and download broken (for myspell useage) dictionaries ;-). Other spellcheck engines than my/hunspell which require other dictionaries will also require a dictionary.lst change to not mix up things completely. For example - how should an Arabic spellcheck engine's dictionary entries be distinguished from an Arabic hunspell dictionary? I hope a dictionary.lst change will come before hunspell will altually BE the default.
Cheers Bjoern
pgpl4hPpWDAk4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
