Hi Olivier, Olivier R. wrote: > Hi László, > > Németh László a écrit : > >> Yes, it is. It would be much better, when the longer affix excludes a >> lot of >> other affix rules. The suffix analysis starts with matching 1-character >> affix rules, >> 2-character rules and so on. Before the using of the "ions" rules, >> Hunspell >> with your affix table checks 386 1-character affix rules with "s" affix, >> and 222 affix rules with "ons" affix. This is not very good. > > !!! :( > I think I have a lot of work for the next days...
Is there any way the French community can help you? May be asking on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] you'll find some volunteers? Thanks a lot for your work :-) Kind regards Sophie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
