Okay...

If you ask two people to write a letter, one person has a computer and once
person has a pen and paper, you'll probably find little difference between
them when it comes to writing a single letter, getting it on paper and in an
envelope.

Now ask them to write the same letter 20 times then the computer user will
do it a lot faster.

Ask them to write completely different letters to 20 different people then
the gain is much reduced.

As I said, the difference is subtle, but you might consider it if you had to
weigh up which platforms to develop on for which applications.

Paolo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 25 July 2002 16:45
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance
> 
> 
> I must be having a stoopid day today...
> 
> What's the difference between software that's faster, and 
> software that
> allows you to do more in the same time?
> 
> Spike
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paolo Piponi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: 25 July 2002 17:43
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance
> > 
> > 
> > Woodwork? Where have you been the last 2000 years. It's all 
> > silicon now.
> > 
> > Yes, I accept your point, but, as I said, you'll probably 
> > find the biggest gain is that you can do more in the same 
> > time. The absolute speed increase will be less. Although 
> > compiled, you must still open, run and close each call. On 
> > simple actions, not much change. But, you can do more in the 
> > same time.
> > 
> > Paolo
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Russ 'Snake' Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 25 July 2002 16:36
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance
> > > 
> > > 
> > > and paolo comes out of the woodwork :-)
> > > Well because it is compiled pcode now instead of interpreted.
> > > Which is a
> > > faster process.
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Paolo Piponi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 25 July 2002 16:39
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Why were we expecting a massive increase in performance?
> > > Software rarely
> > > gets faster, it just allows you to do more in the same time. 
> > > There is a
> > > subtle but profound difference.
> > > 
> > > Paolo
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: 25 July 2002 15:21
> > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > > Subject: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > for those not on the cf-talk list:
> > > >
> > > > performance comparison data has finally been release 
> > comparing cfmx 
> > > > vs cf5 vs cf4.5 performance times.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/
> > > cfmx_performan
> > > ce_brief.pdf
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > Rich Wild
> > > Senior Web Developer
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > e-mango                           Tel: 01202 755 300
> > > Gild House                      Fax: 01202 755 301
> > > 74 Norwich Avenue West
> > > Bournemouth                   Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > BH2 6AW, UK                      http://www.e-mango.com
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This message may contain information which is legally privileged 
> > > and/or confidential.  If you are not the intended 
> > recipient, you are 
> > > hereby notified that any unauthorised disclosure, copying, 
> > > distribution or use of this information is strictly 
> prohibited. Such
> > > notification notwithstanding, any comments, opinions,
> > > information or conclusions expressed in this message
> > > are those of the originator, not of e-mango.com ltd,
> > > unless otherwise explicitly and independently indicated
> > > by an authorised representative of e-mango.com ltd.
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> > > human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> > > human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to