Also did you say you access 40 or so pages in each hit? Are these includes?
Kola >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 12 February 2003 17:58 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX is second class >> >> Interesting. Couple of questions. >> >> What sort of processes did you find to be slower? >> Was it all pages or stuff that used cfquery or cfloops of cffile or >> whatever? >> Were you using the same web server? >> What load server did you use? >> Full version of CFMX or developer Version ? (anyone know if dev version >> uses >> SMP?) >> Which OS ? >> How many CPUS ? >> >> Again I'm not arguing against your statement, just like to know more >> about >> this stuff. >> >> Cheers Justin >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Paolo Piponi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 12 February 2003 17:55 >> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX is second class >> >> >> Oh, yes. Absolutely. >> >> In fact, I had seen many reports beforehand of poor CFMX performance and >> I >> wondered myself how much was down to first time performance. >> >> Unfortunately, my tests were based on real comparisons after compiling. >> Unless, of course, CFMC decided to recompile some of the 40-odd cfm pages >> that I access on each hit. If so, same goes. >> >> Paolo >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 12 February 2003 17:40 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX is second class >> >> >> I'm not saying your are wrong. Just wondering how you tested this? >> I presume you discounted the first time the page was loaded? >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Justin >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >From: Paolo Piponi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 12 February 2003 17:40 >> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >> Subject: [ cf-dev ] CFMX is second class >> >> >> After a month upgrading a 4000 page application (1% pages needed fixing) >> and >> testing and after spending 2 days trying to install CFMX on our >> development >> server, I have come to the conclusion it is too slow. >> >> I even backed out of CFMX and ran CF5 once again on the same machine and >> my >> results show that CFMX is between 15-30% slower. I give a range here >> because >> whilst CF5 was consistent in its reporting, CFMX was very erratic and >> frequently reported very poor times. >> >> Although not what my decision was based on (nor the figure above) when >> monitoring the activity, a web page run on CF5 peaked at 16% CPU and the >> same page on CFMX peaked at 32% - on the same machine. >> >> The benefits of upgrading (some bug fixes, CFCs, etc.) were not important >> enough. I was expecting for at least the same performance and was hoping >> for >> something better. >> >> I am about to report back to my 'superiors' that CFMX is a no-go. >> >> However, after sending countless messages to you guys bugging you for >> support I thought I might pass it back to you one more time for comment. >> >> Paolo >> >> PS Unless a future upgrade recognises this performance issue and we have >> another window of opportunity we will not be upgrading for a very long >> time. >> It seems that Macromedia have been so obsessed with competing for all >> round >> integration they have forgotten what they are here for - to chuck out >> some >> HTML. If this is the direction Macromedia are now going, although very >> reluctantly, we might end of ditching CF, at least for some projects. >> CFMX >> is a second-class web application. I seem to remember a company by the >> name >> of Netscape that went down a similar road. >> >> -- >> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> -- >> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
