> What sort of processes did you find to be slower? Each hit to our site calls in about 40-odd pages. I couldn't identify anything obvious except a general slowing down. The processing-time reporting does differ between 5 and MX so a detailed comparison was difficult.
> Was it all pages or stuff that used cfquery or cfloops of cffile or whatever? Queries seem to take the same amount of time. > Were you using the same web server? Same web server - same server. I installed and uninstalled on the same machine. > Full version of CFMX or developer Version ? (anyone know if dev version uses SMP?) It was the trial version. > Which OS ? W2000 Server > How many CPUS ? 2xPIII450 and 1 gig RAM. I would love someone to convince me otherwise with some real advice, but just haven't found any. I am not against MX in principle. I wouldn't have spent a month on it otherwise. However, I had to accept defeat eventually. Paolo -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
