Have you tried updating to the latest JRE?  that made a minor difference for
me, but I personally didn't have any of these problems when test cfmx...
initially the first time page load was slow, but after that it was
lightening fast  -well maybe not lightening!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paolo Piponi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:10 AM
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX is second class


> I did not contact tech support. I have not bought the product yet and
won't
> if this is what my tests show. If someone thinks I can get tech support
> without buying the product, I will contact them.
>
> I am still open to a convincing argument or advice. I had hoped that my
> first email might provoke some defence but I haven't seen anything yet.
Hit
> me with it.
>
> Paolo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucas Sherwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 February 2003 19:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX is second class
>
>
> Interesting,
> Did you contact tech support?
> If you did, can you please e-mail me your support incident number so I can
> look into why this has not be successfully resolved.
>
> Thanks,
> Lucas.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paolo Piponi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 February 2003 17:40
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [ cf-dev ] CFMX is second class
>
> After a month upgrading a 4000 page application (1% pages needed fixing)
and
> testing and after spending 2 days trying to install CFMX on our
development
> server, I have come to the conclusion it is too slow.
>
> I even backed out of CFMX and ran CF5 once again on the same machine and
my
> results show that CFMX is between 15-30% slower. I give a range here
because
> whilst CF5 was consistent in its reporting, CFMX was very erratic and
> frequently reported very poor times.
>
> Although not what my decision was based on (nor the figure above) when
> monitoring the activity, a web page run on CF5 peaked at 16% CPU and the
> same page on CFMX peaked at 32% - on the same machine.
>
> The benefits of upgrading (some bug fixes, CFCs, etc.) were not important
> enough. I was expecting for at least the same performance and was hoping
for
> something better.
>
> I am about to report back to my 'superiors' that CFMX is a no-go.
>
> However, after sending countless messages to you guys bugging you for
> support I thought I might pass it back to you one more time for comment.
>
> Paolo
>
> PS Unless a future upgrade recognises this performance issue and we have
> another window of opportunity we will not be upgrading for a very long
time.
> It seems that Macromedia have been so obsessed with competing for all
round
> integration they have forgotten what they are here for - to chuck out some
> HTML. If this is the direction Macromedia are now going, although very
> reluctantly, we might end of ditching CF, at least for some projects. CFMX
> is a second-class web application. I seem to remember a company by the
name
> of Netscape that went down a similar road.
>
> --
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com

-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to