Thanks guys so basically apart from the cost CF is the way to go?

CF will be pretty easy for the other people to learn anyway.


Giles Roadnight
http://giles.roadnight.name


-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 31 March 2003 17:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CF vs PHP

Simplified integration I would say is the main one.
Obviously you can integrate with php using a middle layer such as XML but
the ease of working with native objects such as record set objects returned
from CFCs blows this away.

I'd look at raw performance, Flash uses AMF to connect which is much lighter
than encoding your data up from the database using XML and then parsing
that.

So performance is certainly the main one.

Outside of data integration you can of course take advantage of the cfc
architecture both ways. So pulling data is easy in flash with XML but
pushing it back to php is more complex, you can can of course post the data
or do a geturl but if you say wanted to save a recordset back to the server
you would need to parse it up into some xml or textdelimited format and post
it back rather than simply using remoting.

My 2p

Alex




-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to