> My thinking was that a blog can take comments publically, which can be > editted into a "definitive" answer, but in hindsight I'm not > sure that a > blog would give the appropriate structure for an FAQ.
yea, *technically* a weblog is a series of posts arranged in some form of chronological structure, which isn't correct for a faq. I think the thing with most wikis (don't know about cfwiki) is that even if some dilrod does publish a load of gunk, all previous answers are archived and republishable. So, yes, you probably still need an (occasional) administrator just to oversee the quality of the FAQ, but at least you're making it easier for someone to post a question and then for others to add answers (possibly more than one) without having to dish out admin rights all the time. Jeez, never thought I'd see myself standing up for wikis. I guess thats because they always seem to be the most godawful looking things. Is it possible to make one look decent(ish)? -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
