> I'd be interested to hear how that worked. Did you find it > performed well? Was it a busy site? > > Was there a particular reason for this? (storing all the pages in the > db)
Seriously, you are missing the point. It's not that all the pages were in the DB, it's that all the links were dynamic, and so all of the page information was in the DB... It's not easy and it very much depends on what is needed, but... There are some sites out there that do things like use the 404 page to do all the processing (pseudo-code again): 1) Get page requested 2) retrieve from db the page data 3) output page data Now, Yahoo use(d?) something similar (although not returning a 404 - because that would be an error!) for their site and it works very well... Have you ever looked at the page source for the front page? Remember, that what I am not saying is that it takes out all the need for coding pages... It just takes the need for coding page data out... Paul -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
