Paul I just wanted some feedback on how well it worked as it has been suggested to me before for one of our sites so I was curious as to your experience of it.
Thanks Kola >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Paul Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 04 July 2003 10:46 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Cookies anyone.. >> >> > I'd be interested to hear how that worked. Did you find it >> > performed well? Was it a busy site? >> > >> > Was there a particular reason for this? (storing all the pages in the >> > db) >> >> Seriously, you are missing the point. It's not that all the pages were >> in >> the DB, it's that all the links were dynamic, and so all of the page >> information was in the DB... >> >> It's not easy and it very much depends on what is needed, but... >> >> There are some sites out there that do things like use the 404 page to do >> all the processing (pseudo-code again): >> >> 1) Get page requested >> 2) retrieve from db the page data >> 3) output page data >> >> Now, Yahoo use(d?) something similar (although not returning a 404 - >> because >> that would be an error!) for their site and it works very well... Have >> you >> ever looked at the page source for the front page? >> >> Remember, that what I am not saying is that it takes out all the need for >> coding pages... It just takes the need for coding page data out... >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> -- >> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
