If you can get someone to set CVS up right on a Linux box in the first place I always just use WinCVS to connect to it via a Putty SSH tunnel .. works fine for me. CVS has saved me from disaster many times and is worth using :�) (Just getting used to committing etc when you've done something .. we had it set up to roll-out a new version when files were committed so just a few extra clicks etc.)
Stephen -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Moretti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 October 2003 13:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] DWMX2004 Studio 5 was pretty good too and Homesite+ looks pretty much like a re-badged Studio.... :) I'm making a concerted effort to use DWMX, if for nothing else other than the synchronisation and check in/out. Mind you I've been toying with using CVS and it annoys the hell out of me that even after all this time I can't get DWMX to connect via an SSH tunnel! Stephen Rich Wild wrote: > ain't nothing there that'll convince me to migrate from studio 4.5.1 and > topstyle. solid as a rock. > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: 09 October 2003 13:01 >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] DWMX2004 >> >> >>Many reasons....and not sound like an MM salesman ;-)... >> >>better Stylesheet support, >>more of a code editor than previous versions >>more stable (although it has been noted to be slower etc.., I >>havent found that to be the case) generally all round >>polished off from MX 1.0 >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: 09 October 2003 12:56 >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] DWMX2004 >> >> >>Interesting can I ask why? >> >>Kola >> >> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:Neil.Robertson- >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Sent: 09 October 2003 12:50 >>>>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>>>Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] DWMX2004 >>>> >>>>I would say so, yes.... >>>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Sent: 09 October 2003 12:51 >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Subject: [ cf-dev ] DWMX2004 >>>> >>>> >>>>Is there any reason to upgrade to this from DWMX6.1 ? >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>** Archive: >> >>http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For >> >>>>human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>>-- >>>>** Archive: >> >>http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For >> >>>>human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>-- >>** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>-- >>** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
